Search results

Just to be clear the they I speak about is the author/authors and not Ron Paul.

The last point is laughable . To deduct that since he was quoted as saying that he had six to eight writers that would present evidence that he was so distant from the actual identity of them that he even didn't know how many there were. Now that's a stretch. Nice try though.:D

It could easily argued also that instead of abiding by the agreement they are hiding behind the agreement in regards to the the real author.

Yes I agree with your points. I was referring to the article a few post back where she was discussing the non disclosure agreement as a reason that the true author won't come forward. I think this is just an excuse for not identifying the real author. If there were only six to eight that were...

Agree Tbub. I also think the argument he is legally bound not to release the name of the actual author/authors is a bit lame. There are ways to have this resolved. Just have a waiver signed by the actual author releasing any binding litigation . Have the person come out and say "Yes I wrote...

Yes,but the article was in defense of Ron Paul. She was using her own personal knowledge on how ghost writing is done and how many are used. If it isn't pertinent regarding how many ghost writers are used regarding Ron Paul's newsletters then why even mention it. Or at least qualify by saying an...

The article implies that the newsletter had a "army" of possible ghost writers. Paul is on record as saying there was only six to eight total.

Wasn't Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich gleefully slimed and pillared by some in this forum to advance their political agendas as well?

Good riddance. He wasn't really a republican anyway. He donated to a lot of Dems to gain influence such as Obama henchman and current Chicago mayor Rhahm (aka "dead fish",aka "twinkle toes", aka "Al Capone") Emanuel. Trump Gave Rahm Emanuel $50K | NBC Chicago

Maybe there is another thoery that hasn't been explored. Maybe nobody wrote them. They just appeared from nobody out of thin air. Nobody has stepped forward to say they wrote them. Nobody's actual signature is written next to the newsletter so I guess nobody wrote them.

The answer he isn't being straight with IMO is saying he doesn't know who wrote them. He probably doesn't want to out a former or current friend/associate and cause considerable distress for that person. That won't stop Obama and his minions from using every angle of this story to pillar Paul...

People who can't look back at the good ole days from time to time can "sit on it". :D

At least in comparing accomplishments between the two it might be a little bit skewed , if that's the right word. Gingrich became Speaker of the House with the republican revolution in 1994. They had majorities in both houses and Clinton was toast because he wouldn't be able to implement his...

I just heard bits and pieces of Church's show because was out of my vehicle. He probably thinks ok have a press conference address it ONE time with questions and then say he won't talk about it ever again. Instead you have a person interviewing him and asking him pertinent questions and then...

This post isn't a personal attack on Ron Paul. I was listening to Mike Church this morning about this interview. He is definately a supporter of Paul,but thinks the interview didn't come off as good as it should. He basically thinks he should have a news conference to get this topic out of the...

I would look for Newt Gingrich to continue to drop in the polls and probably do worse in the actual caucus. He's been subject to negative advertising from Ron Paul and Mitt Romney. I think Rick Santorum will do better than expected and is moving up.:D Rasmussen poll shows Romney leading 25%...

It's just funny that the fella had lamented how the republicans weren't talking about important issues and wanted the candidates to have serious discussions about important topics that really mattered yet felt compelled to post a billboard about something that has nothing to do with whether a...

RLENT,If I may ask, you are under no obligation to answer,but I was just wondering,why such an ardent ferver to seek out and post items that cast Newt only in a negative light.rather than try a balanced honest light.( Over 10 posts with links,all negative with a pillsbury doughboy comparison...

And then depression set in. (movie Stripes reference):rolleyes:

Uh ok so you don't like Gingrich NOW. I'm just going by memory from a previous post you had that's all. Something about wanting a competent republican to go up aginst Obama. Your choices were Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul. Just trying to keep straight your position.