Search results

[Bold emphasis added for the reading impaired]

LMAO, the partisan nature of your posts and particular topics, mostly including a state in the Middle East on well documented. The lack of self awareness by you is stunning. Not qualifying. More like clarifying for the reading impaired. Stonewalling? Yes or no?

That's not the context-- who have I previously driven for? I have previously driven for Expedite Company A,is my statement. Nothing false in that statement. It stands alone as 100 accurate. How you coming on that Iran stonewalling question?

Nothing ignored. But no need to go bat crazy over the fact that Hot Air didn't mention the 2005 inspection as some sort of deception, or lie by omission. It was a long time ago (Inspection took place months into the previous President's second term and a decade ago. Not really relevant...

Such quality people Obama relied on to get his non majority vote, eh Lentl? Convicted Fraudster Helped Obama Sell Iran Deal - Breitbart

No.it would be 100 correct. I previously drove for expedite company A. There is nothing false about that statement.

Oooh, lookie here Ylentl. Were they stonewalling? New Image Suggests More Suspicious Activity at Parchin

Ylentl ,Still waiting on that answer to the question. Did Iran deny access to the site previously?Come on just answer the question. You don't have to say that they were stonewalling if you don't want to. But you know they were, right?

Ylentl capitulates.

In 2012 they previously stonewalled absolutely everyone. 2012 is previous to 2015. Iran previously stonewalled absolutely everyone back then at a previous time, in 2012. The assertion wasn't that on every occasion since the site has been in existence that they have previously stonewalled. That...

They said Iran previously stonewalled. Is 2012 previous to 2015?

It would be a blanket statement if Hot Air had said that Iran has always stonewalled everyone at the site. But they didn't say that. They used the word previously. Previously stonewalled everyone. So yes or no? Did Iran deny access previously in 2012? It's not so hard to answer the question...

Ylentl, go get your shine box.

Your argument is embarrassing. So because Iran allowed an inspection back in 2005 they no longer could stonewall in any future date?Which they did back in 2012. The assertion that they made is Iran PREVIOUSLY stonewalled everyone .Did they allow UN inspectors access in 2012?Yes or no?

Like 2005 was a while ago. Not very recent. So no U.N inspectors accessed the site in a long time. But Ylentl thought it was some big whoop that they did...ten years ago. So nothing tripped up by me. Just thought it was amusing by Ylentl that's all. Btw, Iran was asked to access the site back in...

Ylentl, this is a completely delusional post by you.

That and the timing of the story. Just a coincidence.:rolleyes:

Nothing tripping me up, but thanks for playing. 2005, it's seems like it was just yesterday.

2005, LMAO.

[Bold emphasis added ] Iran suddenly discovers "unexpected" uranium reserves