Search results

Hmmmm... last time I posted such a critique like you and Turtle just did, a moderator stepped in and admonished me for it, deleted my equally valid post. "I'm all for a double standard. It'd be a reduction in the number of standards in play." And notice the OP, though having been corrected...

If that were true, there would be no ads from couples begging for the chance to adopt. Now, most couples want healthy, beautiful caucasian babies. But if you're saying there should be more abortions (which would affect the other-than-caucasian babies), you're flirting with eugenics. Abortion is...

Like this one?

I was a baby once.

Yet over FIFTY MILLION murdered babies doesn't faze you.

Don't distract the pro-aborts with the facts. Their bloodlust drives them.

And other studies and experts say otherwise. aamof, it's believed that women who in polygamous cultures or situations subconsciously retain or expel semen based on the suitability of the suitor. Regardless, it's not really relevant. Abortion is murder in all circumstances, and murder is wrong.

A woman is fertile for 3-5 days a month. The ovum is present and fertile for more than 1.5 days during the cycle.

A ridiculous statement. That's as accurate as saying nobody would appreciate a kidney or liver. Just as with transplants, there are tens of thousands, if not more, heterosexual couples begging to adopt a healthy baby. They take out ads in national newspapers even. There are enough that the...

No, you want to kill, the onus is on YOU to prove that the homicide is justifiable.

Hmmmm...sounds kind of like the debate that went on in this country regarding the personhood of blacks and Indians. Curious you regard this, then, as forcing morals and beliefs on others. It was the Church that insisted they had souls and were persons. Do you object that the Church succeeded in...

**** you, sir, **** you.

I'm thinking of the other victim, the one you're disregarding. If the baby could testify (and maybe on Judgment Day, he or she will) about the abortion from his or her perspective, how the scalpel shredded them, the pain he or she felt, and how he or she DID die. Try thinking about what that...

She will likely think of the rape every day for months regardless. As horrible as it is, prenatal infantacide will not un-rape her, and brings bloodguilt on both her and society.

That's an opinion, and a wrong one, considering there's a baby involved. You have no idea, and can never have any idea, of what you are talking about! I'm far more knowledgeable on the subject than most. I studied it to debate those I'm favor of prenatal infantacide.

It's not a belief; it's a known fact--that pregnancy caused by rape is rare, and that the trauma is believed to play a role in this.

Let's rip you limb from limb and see if you're considered a victim. Anguish is horrible, but there is no right to murder to spare yourself anguish.

Thank you for making my point for me: euphemizing prenatal infantacide--murder--by calling it terminating a pregnancy or eliminating a non-viable tissue mass doesn't change the fact that it's murder.

I'm sorry for her trouble, but I didn't invent the human processes of reproduction. Find Whoever/whatever you think did and take it up with Him/Her/it. The rape victim's comfort or finances do not negate the baby's right to life.

Another distortion. I've never said all cops are bad, or never do anything good or correctly. I've been accused of saying that before, by you, I think. Being that this is the 2nd time for that false accusation, it's time for you to take that lie back. We certainly can't now, being that he's...