Search results

Agree, but if there is a corporate tax reduction coming in the near future maybe it won't have to be that way.

They'll just have to pay more for their labor. I don't have sympathy for the ones (contractors/ companies) that skirt the laws and pay very low wages to illegal immigrants because they want to 'do it on the cheap' so they can make a higher profit. And then complain that U.S. citizens won't do...

The phrase 'just win baby' comes to mind. The election was all about winning the electoral college. So whatever it took to get it done. Trump did, Hillary didn't. Hillary can make a copy of a newspaper headline saying she won the popular vote, frame it, and hang it in her house. The non...

Either a Republican, someone else or not at all. Depends on the candidate, and if he has a spine. Not a Democrat. That party is gone. I guess we'll have to keep trying to add to the majority so that it's like double the amount. To offset the spineless ones.

What Turtle said three posts back. Plus, the Republicans won the White House, the Senate, and the House, right? Just checking. SMH...Couldn't pass a bill to repeal Obamacare after 7 years, but allowed this phony Russian collusion investigation to metatistisize, and are now pushing a bill so...

Here is what those redacted talking points look like:

With regards to your jury selection experience, it appears you were involved with some generic cases. What I'm talking about is a specific highly partisan election that took place not too long ago. If one was paying attention there was a high degree of dejection and anger (among other emotions)...

At the time Trump fired Comey he wasn't under investigation. Three times Comey told him that. But Comey wouldn't publicly disclose that fact and Trump felt that it contributed to undermining his presidency, his agenda. You say some would offer that firing Comey is evidence of obstruction. Many...

Although it sparked suspicion, there was no evidence of Trump doing anything wrong or illegal. Trump wasn't even under investigation by Comey.

No, I just thought Rollins' idea was better than what we have now; An apparent investigation veering off to other things that aren't connected to Russian meddling. I don't know much about Mueller. But his actions so far look very troubling in conducting a fair investigation: Quite a few Obama...

I happened to watch Republican consultant Ed Rollins last night on Fox Business channel. He thinks that Mueller should be persuaded to resign( yeah, good luck with that) and instead have one Democrat and one Republican head the investigation.

This whole phony collusion story was just 'a in' so that they could get a SP to snoop around with Trump's finances.

That may be true, but say there were 15 or 21 journalists from the New York Times, The Atantic, and The Washington Post( whatever the grand jury number is) that were empaneled on a Grand Jury. Would you feel confident that they could put their biases aside and look at the evidence objectively?

Regarding whether Mueller should be looking at Hillary's email scandal, probably not that specifically, but her campaign should be looked at as well if we are going to have an investigation of Russian meddling in our election. At least according to the Fake News CNN, ( take this with a grain of...

It may be routine, but the deck will be stacked against Trump since it is a DC Grand Jury. Probably most if not all voted against Trump in the past election.

Fire McMaster. Fire Mueller.

If the Republicans agree to impeach, they will be setting their own party on fire.

Just heard Trump say tonight that Infrastructure bill is coming soon.

Look how the Fake News media turns a blind eye to that too. Very telling.

It's not a crime to collude with Russia. So even if Trump's campaign associates did,(which they didn't anyway)big whoop. But since we're on the Russian collusion thing, the only evidence of it is by the Fake News media who peddled that fake Russian dossier in the public to damage their political...