Search results

There's no other possibility. If you have a right to something or to not do it, and you choose to, you have waived that right, simple as that. That goes for letting someone go ahead of you when you have the right-of-way, or answering questions put to you by the police when you don't have to, etc.

Limiting it to "at the border" limits the violation of our rights. They make sure that you are entitled to those rights by being a citizen here, and at that point, you have the right to proceed unmolested.

Collectivism rears its ugly head again. "There's only one fundamental right: the right to do as you **** well please. With it comes the only fundamental responsibility: the responsibility to take the consequences." There are no other responsibilities to which you did not knowingly and willingly...

Waive all of your rights that you want--all of YOURS.

No, what I said was that they can be wrong. They're very fallible human beings like us, apparently even moreso. That they rule a certain thing does not make it right.

Nope. There are examples of which that would be true, but some things are always wrong and always have been. That one views them through the eyes of 1000 years ago or 1000 years from now is irrelevant.

What does the date have to do with it? If you want a more recent outrage, think of Kelo vs. New London, or Roe vs. Wade, or the decision that said it was flawed reasoning but it shouldn't be overturned because it's come to be viewed as a right. All more modern, though that shouldn't matter to...

State trooper pulls over mayor, then the mayor pulls over the trooper. The mayor fancies himself a lawman, apparently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGxc4U4N4Xo&feature=youtube_gdata_player Found more info: The State Law Enforcement Division has been asked by the S.C. Department of Public...