It probably went like this:
Supervisor: " Yeah, there is just too much here, so this isn't going to work. Now you can either let us fire you or you can "resign" and still collect your 80,000 a year pension. The choice is yours".
Give it time.
Garland hemmed and hawed 3 weeks . He could have easily got an opinion from the Legal council. But the DOJ was afraid of what they would say because the OLC would have to include relevant court case and their defense of the 2012 one.
Why did they seek out the biased anti Trump Magistrate instead of an article 3 Federal judge?
Why didn’t they include a Office Of Legal Council opinion in their affidavit?
A shady way to do it.
As the song goes “Regrets, there a few.”
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/fbis-former-intel-chief-raid-trump-home-i-think-they-are-going
The ends justify the means apparently:
https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/29/the-fbis-trump-raid-should-concern-every-american-including-his-detractors/
“Find me the man and I’ll twist and concoct a crime”
https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/29/redacted-mar-a-lago-affidavit-confirms-bidens-doj-fished-for-a-crime-to-pin-on-trump/
What could go wrong? :tearsofjoy:
https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/meet-the-conspiracy-theorist-advising-joe-biden-on-the-intelligence-community/
Oh, lookie here:
In the tradition of McCabe and Stryk.
https://beckernews.com/fbi-special-agent-who-opened-trump-investigation-has-been-escorted-out-of-bureau-headquarters-46623/
Looks like they will be advertising now on Truth Social. I hadn’t seen any up to this point, but apparently it’s about to change.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trumps-truth-social-blasts-reports-financial-trouble-knowingly