Search results

That’s not the point. It’s about her position as chief law enforcement office holder making decisions to prosecute people with likely impaired judgment.

Admitted alcoholic with repeated drinking in public and joked about it afterwards. That certainly points to her judgement. The Feds even declined this case, but she went ahead anyway. Was this decision done while sober? It doesn’t appear so.

She didn’t drive drunk because she was so blitzed that she was wheelchaired out of the stadium. Keep finding excuses and enabling.

Didn’t know she was 54. I thought by her behavior that she was in her late thirties maybe. What does this say also about the enablers around her( staff, assistants) that know about her alcoholism yet still allow her to drink and get drunk in public? They should do better.

The FBI ignored it too.

That’s what I meant by the “tip of the iceberg” thing. You may see a friend having a drink or two at the bar but don’t see the rest of the story when they go home and drink a fifth. So please retract your accusation that I’m lying.

Peddling influence:

March,2022:

Who is Google Bard?

I noticed that there was a large amount of joking and excuses made from her public intoxication. That is what alcoholics do. They make excuses for their actions. Also, often what someone sees publicly from an alcoholic is just the tip of the iceberg of what is really going on with the person...

Millennial generation is now roughly 50 percent conservative now.

How come the Dems are blowing off all the revealing testimony from the whistleblowers? Truth must hurt too much.

True

You know they call that? Enabling

This person’s judgement is deciding charges:

Care to reevaluate that opinion? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/11/11/michigan-attorney-general-dana-nessel-wasted-college-football/

The charges looks like someone that may have been heavily intoxicated.

If the Alternate Electors didn’t convene and submit the document then whatever potential legal challenges that were successful would have been moot because there wouldn’t have been any ( Republican) electors submitted by the December 14 deadline. This is what the AG is calling a crime and...

Here is what the Michigan AG is saying a crime and why they rounded up seniors for a document discrepancy where they put on the form that they met at the Capitol instead of a Republican committee basement. She wants to put the seniors away for 14 years because of it. Something even the Feds...

And there we have it. The obligatory Trump in diaper post.