Search results

Meadows did bad on the stand? Did you hear that from MSNBC?

You know the Left can’t meme when they get the very first line in it wrong.

They’ll be using the Supreme Court precedent of the term “officer” in their ruling.

Pilgrim’s article has some excellent arguments. I’ll add an additional article to that. Where in the 14th Amendment does it mention a president? It doesn’t. It was not written pertaining to a president...

Clinton judge.

ONE PERSON that voted three times? The Left apparently protects their side when they engage in it. A woman was arrested, then released. She traveled back to Detroit. Muskegon wanted to extradite her back, but Detroit refused. Forging documents is a big deal, right...

Episode 20: “Call back Trump.” https://x.com/tuckercarlson/status/1696643892253466712?s=46&t=d_l2HMNrla_oQHd9HhBKfw

This isn't good as well for the authoritarian fans with the pompoms.

House of cards indictment:

Don’t take it from me. Take it from an experience lawyer and former federal prosecutor with over 20 years experience. Put that in Bard and smoke it: https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1696549030996877613?s=46&t=d_l2HMNrla_oQHd9HhBKfw

A seated Obama judge.

Tell Bard to stay tuned.

Obama judge.

A nothingburger. Nothing wrong with asking to remove fraudulent and illegal votes. And to find legal votes that weren’t counted. https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/27/opinion-anti-trump-smoking-gun-is-a-toy-pistol-deroy-murdock/

It’s called an interlocutory appeal. But there are other motions that they can use based on the impeachment clause and the supremacy clause. And no the 14th Amendment section 3 doesn’t pertain to Presidents.

If a judge is bias, they’re not going to recuse themselves. They’ll rationalize to themselves that that they can be fair, yet all the while giving the DOJ everything they ask for because in reality they are on their side. Her public comments in others related cases overwhelmingly indicate this...

Dream on.

Speedy trials are now in fashion again: