Search results

Good development. Solid appealable basis: https://x.com/willscharf/status/1709994666467192942?s=46&t=d_l2HMNrla_oQHd9HhBKfw

Oh, lookie here. She’s not telling the truth: https://x.com/mrddmia/status/1709959212816568752?s=46&t=d_l2HMNrla_oQHd9HhBKfw

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/27/61-hacks-peddled-russian-collusion-never-trusted/ A few examples from them:

Continuing Resolutions forever until the next enormous omnibus and adding trillions to the debt with no end in sight, is that the answer? Is that functional?

Many still are. But where are the Dems saying no more? Hardly anyone.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/05/17/durham-report-vindicates-trump-fbi-russia-investigation/70222344007/

They endorse stopping the exploding debt and endless spigot to Ukraine, for starters.

McCarthy thought Pelosi would deliver Dem votes to protect him from being ousted. She told him he would be protected. Trusting her was his first mistake. :JC-hysterical:

Some have the clown argument that a couple Russian troll farms( that weren’t prosecuted) is evidence of Russia collusion and people that protested the removal of a statue before the knotsies showed up can’t be very fine people.

Gaslighting has taken on a new meaning in the past few years. Especially with those in the “news” media that repetitively tell a lie to their audience. Like Russia collusion and the fine people on both sides Trump press conference. They say the lie over and over again that their audience...

I'm sure they'll pull that number out of their....too.

That’s false.The jury trial wasn’t available to him because the statute doesn’t allow it. What is nonsense is the amount of legal “experts” gaslighting their audiences on Fake News falsely claiming that the lawyer screwed up...

https://x.com/trumpwarroom/status/1709634709121073327?s=46&t=d_l2HMNrla_oQHd9HhBKfw Trump defending himself and gaining voters.

Especially when the indictment “rule” includes politically weaponized ones, which they all are.

For those with the clownish argument that it’s against the rules for Trump to be Speaker, that’s some funnychit right there. Having “rules” never stopped the Dems from ignoring them when they wanted to. See Harry Reid filibuster change or J6 show trial without Republican leadership on it. Also...

Trump nominated for House Speaker.

Trump hasn’t been President for almost 3 years.

Could be a standard form cover sheet with choices on it. But they checked box because they knew there wasn’t a choice per statute.

Fake News. Apparently they weren’t able to choose a jury trial, per statute. https://www.newsmax.com/politics/andrew-napolitano-newsmax-donald-trump/2023/10/03/id/1136781/