Search results

#surejan #mightwantositthisoneout

Too much emphasis on Ukraine and the wasteful billions for one.

A hundred billion more to Ukraine (at least) and more to money for Israel will be their carrot on a stick.

Trump was just stating what the penalty used to be for that offense. There was no implication.

No, that I do. Pesky fact

More than you. No doubt.

What if they were “posing a threat”? We were told previously that was a justification to defend oneself with the use of deadly force.

No, he’s not calling for that. The quote is in the caption below. He was referring to what the penalty used to be.

In recapping: The “injured parties” as a basis for speedy trials involving Trump include: 1) a records keeper butt hurt because he didn’t get his documents within his timetable. 2) an adult entertainer/ extortionist getting her 250,000 and then whining about it later. 3) Big Banks that made an...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_delayed_is_justice_denied

https://www.newsweek.com/judge-cannon-was-right-appoint-special-master-opinion-1740761

This is in reference to an “injured party” as a basis for a speedy trial. There is no injured party.

So what? Her decision was based on a fundamental principle to protect the accused of prosecutorial abuse.

It’s expected that they’ll deny but this is a process to get it to the Supreme Court.

“Injured party”: The Big Banks received their money back with interest and sometimes earlier than the terms of the loan.

More on this excellent development: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trump-lawyers-seek-dismissal-dc-federal-election-subversion-103762292

“Injured party”: The courts were inconvenienced by election challenges.

According to the Left when Trump gets a favorable ruling from judge Cannon it’s “troubling” and an “indication of bias”. But when a Democratic judge gives the prosecution everything they desire against Trump, it’s considered sound judicial review.