Search results

He will be speaking on the 14th Amendment eligibility. Stay tuned.

Impeaching a private citizen. Clown move.

I concur:

I got the point. Like I said, it explains a lot.

Interesting. That word salad explains a lot.

They looked at the evidence and decided to acquit him and allow him to retain all of his powers as President. If that’s not worthy, I don’t know what is.

Only three of the nine judges are Trump appointees.

They voted for him to remain in office and retain all the executive powers as president, right?

Why did they do it then?

They thought it was important enough to purposely omit it from public view. Regardless, expect the SCOTUS to rule on this at some point as well regarding the impeachment clause.

What was the purpose of the impeachment trial if it wasn’t to decide if he should be expelled from office under the constitution?

Not true. It was based on the evidence presented whether it deemed him not able( worthy in essence ) to continue as president

But the Left used the fact that Trump mentioned the word “fight” in his speech multiple times to say that is inculpatory evidence while downplaying and even omitting a mention of him saying the word “peacefully” and using the word “peaceful” and “peace” multiple times. That’s the center of their...

They omitted the part where he said “peacefully” in his speech when they played it at the impeachment trial.

Why do you state that this court is “pro-Trump”?

The Senate acquitted Trump after hearing the evidence, thus deciding he was still worthy to be president under the Constitution.

The 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to Presidents. Trump was also acquitted in the Senate anyway.

Stay tuned. The SCOTUS will eventually rule on this. All in good time.

Did the Dems omit the part about "peacefully"or not? It's well documented they did. Why is Bard lying? Trump clearly said the word "peacefully" in his speech. He also used the words "peaceful" twice and "peace" three times that day at least.

"Pro Trump court".