Search results

Thank you, RLENT, for pointing us toward the transcript. Do you happen to know of a good place online to see all the court documents concerning Donald J. Trump v. The United States? For future reference, I'd like to compile a list of those documents and links to them. TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION TO...

They may already have and searches may already have been conducted. We would not know about any such searches unless Trump broadcasts that news out like he did about the Mar-a-Lago search.

What goes around comes around. https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/03/politics/trump-jail-sentences-mishandled-classified-information-kfile/index.html

When I was an infantry officer, if I wanted an order to be obeyed, I gave it in a way that it would be received and understood. So too the the president. When you expect other people to act on your orders and make happen what you want to happen, you can't just think stuff up and call it good. I...

I think it is helpful to distinguish between wishful thinking and actual deeds. If my house is burning, I can imagine calling the fire department. I can even say to myself and others I called the fire department. But the fire department is a real entity in the real world and it does not know...

You make your point well. I'm not going to fully agree with you about the role of orignialism, but the Bryer "argument" you share above is not a legal argument at all.

Did the documents actually become declassified? Do they now exist in the public domain in unredacted form?

More About The Courts Just an additional thought about the courts. One of the reasons we have the courts at all is because it is not always clear how the law applies. A current example is crypto. Crypto is a new form of currency, made possible by technology the nation's founders could not have...

The "so what" is the tweets had no legal effect. They were tweets, not official actions. Another "so what" is those tweets may come back to bite Trump. They indicate his knowledge that there is a distinct process for declassifying documents. So far, at least, he has been unable to produce any...

About This Judge Cannon I said earlier that I had an open mind about this judge who is hearing and about to rule in Donald J. Trump v. The United States. When she signaled her "preliminary intent" to give Trump what he wants (a special master to screen documents seized in the Mar-a-Lago...

Yes. Every higher-court ruling that is not unanimous has dissenting opinions in which conflicting views are stated. But in all of them, the judges do their best to base their views on the law. The reason we have courts in the first place is the application of the law is not always clear. The...

And that, my friend, is why I so love the courts. A good judge will consider the law and the facts, not the biases of the person submitting the brief. It is obvious the "anti-Trumpers," as you call them, have a point of view; a bias in a certain direction. They flat-out state it in their brief...

Amicus Brief Filed in the Donald J. Trump v. The United States As Judge Cannon does her homework and crafts her ruling regarding Trump's request for a special master, she will have this amicus brief to use as a resource. "An amicus curiae is an individual or organization who is not a party to...

I think you're right, Pilgrim. We'll not likely have to wait long, like weeks long, to see Judge Cannon's ruling. And the fact that she did not rule from the bench and has not yet issued a written ruling (as of mid-afternoon Friday) suggests she is indeed giving the matter careful consideration...

Indicting Trump would in no way discourage him from running again. Trump has never once (at least never once that I know of) talked about not running. I think he was committed 100% to running long before he left the White House.

New York Post Turns on Trump The Post editorial cites the Mar-a-Lago scandal and Trump's ego as reasons for Republicans to move on from Trump. Excerpts: "Yes, Trump did much good in his four years: Notice how Democrats have opted not to repeal his tax cuts. But he lost in 2020 because too many...

Note that Trump does terrible in court. He has lost more court cases than any major figure in American history. In court, Trump is good at two things: 1. Causing delays 2. Losing

While We Wait ... Yesterday's news was that Judge Cannon ordered the release of a revised list of items seized in the Mar-a-Lago search, and that she will make a ruling on Trump's special master request "in due course." As we wait for those, I find myself zooming out a bit to view the bigger...

I agree with you for the most part, only I think the women got pissed off on their own. It was the Supreme Court decision that pissed them off, not the Democrats. The Democrats are using this energy to organize opposition and win elections.

Judge Orders Release of Detailed Property List "West Palm Beach, Florida — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the release of a detailed list of the property seized during the FBI's search at former President Donald Trump's South Florida residence last month, while reserving judgment on whether...