Search results

Yeah, I'm a bit slow today.

OK, I will accept that.

I do no work on any I am a truck driver, you are a mechanic. We each have our job to do.

I choose @layoutshooter. He is equally critical of both parties and remains true to his beliefs ie, no pandering.

Too much information!

We are forgetting about the millions of registered Dems that didn't vote at all be cause of the pandering to to the far right. Had Romney remained true to his positions, those that did not vote at all just might have crossed over. We will never know now.

My point exactly.

Yes we have, indeed.

Please, let's agree to keep our disagreements to today's issues. LBJ and Nixon both did enough damage to the country at the time. We were so close to armed revolution because of both of them.

Nah, won't do it! Just won't do it.

Go to your screen name, click, click on conversations. That is what pm is now called.

There is not a snowball in hells chance anybody could defend the story as written. Your comment otherwise is rude, insulting, and uncalled for.

Had Romney ran as Romney, not as Romney pandering to the tea partners, he would have won. There were many ready to cross if he had done this.

There in lays the problem. Not immigrants, not msm, not liberals, but the Rep party itself.

Thank you Mr Battery Meister. I just hope the OP isn't as confused as I am. :smug:

Had the Reps presented a viable alternative, maybe, just maybe Obama looses. That's my point with Hillary, give those millions an alternative.

Probably true, but what about the millions that didn't vote because the Reps did not have somebody they would cross over for. If the Reps nominate such a person, they will win in a landslide. You read it here first.

Thanks Founder dude!