Search results

This song is appropriate in soooo many ways: Cyndi Lauper's, True Colors (emphasis added) You with the sad eyes Don't be discouraged Oh, "we' realize It's hard to take courage In a world full of people You can lose sight of it all And the darkness inside you Can make you feel...

The comedic timing on that one was Brilliant!! I don't care who that was towards, it was funny. A short story that included irony, sarcasm and word play. A joke of text book proportions.

HA HAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHA HAHA.......oh man, stop, you're killin' me!!

Now I am really worried!!

You list four bills above, I count three, please clarify wich bills you are referring to, then let me know where I have stated my support on any of them. Getting back to the question presented to the Soapbox. Soooo.....what you would you like to see done with the Bush-era tax...

Okay???? I'm starting to worry about you Greg.

hmmmm....care to show me where I have or have not supported the bills you've mentioned above?

Greg, I truly am interested in what principles you think he has sold. Anything?

Yes, that would be logical, especially after making a comment as strong as the one he did. But I'll just take his opinion on how Mr. Paul sold his principles anyway.

Your link took me to Mark Levin's website. I then searched for Wyatt Emmerich of the Cleveland Current after reading the story. That took me to a page with a list of blogs and message boards with Sean Hannity's forum listed first. I searched Wyatt Emmerich, nothing. I searched Wyatt Emmerich...

Care to share with us on how you would know if I was or was not a deficit hawk? When you have something intelligent to say come back and join the conversation.

If you will, what principles did he sell in your opinion?

In simple terms, I would like to see them expire, go back to what they were. The "Sunset Provision"(for more on that go here:http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/26312.html) was put in place because these tax provisions are not payed for. Cut spending and pay down the deficit.

Since I brought up corruption in another thread and Ron Paul in another thread, I would like to say this, "In my opinion, I think this guy is the least corrupt person in Washington, for that reason alone he should be our next President of these United States of America." ****Attention*****...

If I knew how to change the title I would. If anyone know's how to do this I would be more than happy to learn how it is done. Or if a Moderator out there can do it, you have my permision to so.

Alrighty then. How 'bout this? We'll call them, Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax provisions. Unless of course you have a better way of describing what is going to happen or not happen to our taxes on Jan. 1st. 2011.

By the way, when I say,"serious judgement", I mean a life sentence or death penalty. Which I think neither will get, especially since the precedence has already been set.

Thank you for the link. This is not going to be an open and shut case, in my opinion. Again, intent will be the deciding factor if the Private and Mr. Assange have any luck surviving serious judgement. As far as I know, we haven't even charged him with a crime yet. The Brit's have him, the...

Agreed. Lest not forget the corruption that goes on in Washington AND at the State level. Take for instance the $7.4 billion Health Bill for 9/11 responders that's in the Senate right now being fillibustered by the GOP. I highly doubt that Republicans in the Senate do not want to help...

Sooo....you would like to see them extended then?