Search results

C'mon man...you know I love ya...:cool:

It's over when I say it's over...:mad:

I wonder if they were Daisy Dukes??

Uh, I think the answer is in your question....

Maybe Canada was built on such subserviance, I don't know. Maybe that is where you get it, I don't know. What I can tell you is that even though this is a private forum, it would be nothing without the members. If the members are routinely silenced for issues that are unsubstantiated, in a forum...

I do not think they thought it through. I refer you again to post #104. You are right. They do not have to prove anything to anyone. When the time comes, and it likely will, that a mistake is made against you or some other innocent victim, don't cry about it....That's "just the way it is"

"It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority" Benjamin Franklin

Whether or not Mr. Travels consulted with anyone prior to making a post is nether here nor there. Once again I ask: WHAT RULE DID HE BREAK? WHAT PROOF IS THERE HE BROKE ANY RULE? SHOW IT TO ALL OF US!!!!!

That has not at all been proven. Read post #104. Show me PROOF Doug did something wrong. I don't believe you can.

Where I come from that isn't at all liberalism. It's called standing up for due process. If you were to take the time to read about the fifth amendment to the U.S. Constitution, you might learn something about it. It's funny how when you and your cronies can't find any other avenue to make a...

YES! Unbannish Dougstertravels Now!!!

Every showman acts differently my friend.....nuf said.

You are likely right. But is there proof? I recall some one throwing around the term "N" word a while back. In fact I think that might be around the time Doug really started to get persecuted....Hmm...now who was that?....

Perhaps...but indulge me for a second: Highway Star: EO member Highways tar: Possible road pavement or pot hole repair material.. Are these 2 different things? The point is somethings aren't always as they seem. The case against Doug is weak at best.

You didn't see them. There was no "them". The collection of letters he used could have been interpreted in more than one way. This in no way should violate the rules of this forum. I'm not sure it even does. I want to see the rules on abbreviations and acronyms..

Well, it is a little disturbing that a woman would be whipped just for wearing pants. I hope they are at least fashionable. As a side note, I know many men in the U.S.who allegedly "wear pants" that have been whipped for years....

I kinda like the huggy kissy stuff... makes me feel warm and fuzzy all over.

Thanks...I'll bite your ankles anytime...:)

Wasn't Mr. Gautama preaching Anarchy as self reliance? Is that what you mean?

Where did this take place? Most of these headquarters are not actively operating at this time...If you believe in the constitution and true capitalism, come with us...Check it out, it's in my signature below.