Search results

Just curious - how long ago did this happen? Seems like if it was recent the tree-huggers and conservationists would have been going nuts.

Now that you're thinking like a liberal, you won't be able to comprehend that criminals don't care about the laws on the books, or any that might be added in the future. This mindset happens to be in sync with our liberal POTUS and Atty. General who only enforce the laws that further their...

Apparently this decision relates to Chevron corporate policy. The letter linked below addresses recent legislation in LA, but clearly spells out Chevron's strict policy prohibiting firearms on their property. https://upstream.chevron.com/contractorgom/documents/Firearms_Letter.pdf

Is there a link on their website offering more details - such as which year this killoff took place? To reach these numbers, Oregon fishermen would have had to kill 274 eagles every day of the year! This sounds like el toro poo-poo to me. The closest kill numbers I can find for this kind of...

It's off topic big time. The subject matter is Eddie Eagle gun safety classes and whether or not they should be offered. Should gun safety classes be mandatory - no. Optional - like driver's ed - why not? Maybe that's worth discussing in some parts of the country like TX, WY, TN, WV where gun...

Source for the info please???

OK, the horse still has a pulse because there's obviously something I need to clarify, or perhaps re-emphasize. My post #3 was not a response to your post #2 - notice you were not quoted in it. It was a reply to the thread in an effort to better state the point in the OP that I assumed the turd...

That might be true had the comments referred to by the OP in addition to the article. Maybe some people consider comments to be part of an article nowadays - most people don't. Personally, I don't give a d*mn about the comments following any article. However, I agree that it's a bit strange that...

Apparently you need emoticons to detect sarcasm. More "responsible" than the public at large since people get all kinds of things stolen from vehicles all the time - the most popular being laptops/iPads, GPS devices, cell phones and car registrations. Guns aren't even on the list. Ten Things...

All I'm concerned with is the contents of the article and the point the author is trying to make. The comments of the readers are irrelevant because we don't know who's making them or their level of experience and knowledge of the subject matter. For all we know most of the comments could have...

Well, I went to Home Depot yesterday with Mr. Walther tucked neatly tucked away and concealed by my baggy Hawaiian shirt. Spoke to the hot dot vendor and bought my 5 gal of paint without incident. A couple of things occurred to me as I thought about the posts in this thread: 1. My Home Depot...

I'll bet all of these victims were unarmed, and so was the security guard. If the hot dog vendor had been packing the robber would have moved on to somebody else; likely the same thing for the 70 year old dude. Actually, I'm heading to Home Depot for some paint as soon as I finish this post -...

I may not agree with every word written, and I didn't bother to read the irrelevant comments; but I agree with the gist of the article which is pretty well summed up in this paragraph: "When criminals can knowingly walk into a store, a movie theater, a bank, or any other building that forbids...

I think this news report may be an example of the point being made in the OP: The point happens to be that the nut cases and criminals don't care about gun control laws or policies banning guns in certain areas.

It's a start just to have somebody show some leadership for a change. The governors of the states need to fill this responsibility because POTUS is literally out to lunch.

The proposed walls and fences have only been partially funded and built. There is no will from the Obama administration to enforce the existing laws or even make a reasonable effort to control our borders - that's the problem.

Absolutely, positively incorrect. Not sure which dictionary LOS used, but this one is from Merriam-Webster. Pay particular attention to #2. (emphasis mine) There are all kinds of instances of which invaders or invasions can exist without hostile intent. Here are a couple of others that involve...

It depends on the definition of mean.

Bugs can't have intentions, hostile or otherwise - their brains aren't that highly developed. Bugs have instincts, and at the level of shipworms and termites their primary instincts are survival and procreation. One of these instincts is to eat; ships and houses just happen to be on their menu...

According to definitions #3 & #4 your usage is correct. The shipworms in 1917 had no hostile intent, and neither do termites or stink bugs that invade/infest someone's house. They're just looking for something to eat and an acceptable place to live and procreate. The bugs can't conceive that...