It would certainly be far better to not attack Iran and let them build a bunch of suitcase dirty bombs and only attack after they use a bunch of them around the U.S.
First of all, Kissinger back in 1974 told Iran that they could have nuclear reactors for energy. So now what is the problem?
Iran has never threatened us or attacked us. So what is the problem?
Clinton sold nuclear reactors to North Korea during his administration, however, North Korea is a supposed enemy. When will you all get it? War is profitable for the rich. Lives are not expendable in the name of the buck.
We told the pre-revolutionary Iran that we would sell them the technology in 1973 not give them permission in 74.
You tend to forget a few things about Iran;
The shah kept things under control until Carter pulled all support from under him.
Islamic Revolution that took place was just the start. Ayatollah Khomeini was put in place as the supreme leader with the idea that all infidels must be subjugated or die.
Actually we are at war with them due to the attack on our embassy. International law is clear on this issue and they have not only threatened us but also other countries.
Well Clinton also sold missile technology to the Chinese but we don’t see him being charged with treason do we.
As for the war being profitable for the rich, who are the rich?
We will end up tied up in a war with Iran but not of our doing. Apparently you don’t understand the Arab mind.
Iran has never threatened us or attacked us.
And you get that information from where? The hostages who spent 444 days in captivity? The embassy people who were attacked? Rather than telling someone who makes well written posts with facts to back them up to put down the crack pipe perhaps it would be better if you put down the kookaid cup. Whatever you do, put away the personal insult pen because "ate up with stupid" isn't appropriate even in the soapbox.
Rantwell-----you actually give credibility to a former KKK leader??? One that could easily be labelled a terrorist?
Rantwell...if one looks at this NAU issue...with me being a Canadian...or say i was a Mexican....I'd be suspicious that this isn't some sneaky way for the U.S. to take over the 2 countries peacefully. That being the real hidden agenda...Oil to the north and oil to the south...interesting counter theory eh?
And you get that information from where? The hostages who spent 444 days in captivity? The embassy people who were attacked? Rather than telling someone who makes well written posts with facts to back them up to put down the crack pipe perhaps it would be better if you put down the kookaid cup. Whatever you do, put away the personal insult pen because "ate up with stupid" isn't appropriate even in the soapbox.
Document please the proof that he was a former KKK member.
I agree with you on the NAU. I think the gov't is all about resources.
Divide and conquer is how they operate.
Article from 2004
David Duke considering run for Congress
Could be released from prison in April
Friday, January 23, 2004
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, in federal prison after pleading guilty to mail and tax fraud, is considering a run for Congress when he is released this year, his secretary said Friday.
David Duke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
David Duke in 2008
Member of the Louisiana House of Representatives from the 81 district In office 1989 – 1992
Preceded by Chuck Cusimano
Succeeded by David Vitter
Born July 1, 1950 (1950-07-01) (age 58)
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Political party Republican
Spouse Chloe Eleanor Hardin (m. 1974, div. 1984)
Children Erika Duke
Kristin Duke
Residence Mandeville, Louisiana
Occupation Activist
Religion Christian[1]
Website The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD
David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is a former Louisiana State Representative, a candidate in presidential primaries for the Democratic and Republican parties, and former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.