Search results

Trump Stronger, DeSantis Weaker ... In Florida! "April 19 (Reuters) - Donald Trump continued to rack up endorsements in Florida for his presidential campaign on Wednesday, outmaneuvering the state's Governor Ron DeSantis on his home turf."

For now, yes it is. Bragg appealed the decision. We'll see how this judges ruling holds up at the appellate level. But for now, Braggg's arguements did not prevail.

Poor, weak Fox could not afford lawyers? Fox came to court with lawyers whose offices are in strip malls? Fox hired just one or two lawyers because they wanted to save money? Fox hired Sydney Powell and Rudy Giuliani to represent them? Nope. None of that. Fox settled this case not because their...

Had the super-majority and/or the speaker stripped him of his committee assignments and/or censured him and left it at that, the name Justin Jones would be as obscure today in the country as it was before. His district voters did not expel him, the Republican super-majority did; and that's what...

The only way to know that is to ask them. I know nothing about their mindset but it is not inconceivable they consider Jones one of their chief advocates and friends. On the other hand, they may consider the casket gesture highly offensive or heartbreaking. Unless they tell us, we won't know...

Trump, Christie & Pence Trash DeSantis's Disney Stance Trump: “DeSanctus is being absolutely destroyed by Disney. His original P.R. plan fizzled, so now he’s going back with a new one in order to save face,” Trump said on Truth Social, unveiling a new nickname for the governor. (Source)...

I think in this case the House did indeed enforce it's rules and Jones complied. I understand there was a protest going on outside the building in which a number of protesters had a number of those small coffins, which they were using as props to make their point about gun control. Apparently...

Fox & Dominion Statements Fox Corp. just released a statement: “We are pleased to have reached a settlement of our dispute with Dominion Voting Systems. We acknowledge the court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false. This settlement reflects Fox’s continued commitment to...

I have my answer. Under the terms of the settlement, Fox News will not be required to apologize or admit spreading false claims on network programing.

The difference is not statements about the machines reported as news. The difference is defamation and malice. You are comparing apples and oranges.

Yep. Fox caved. How much is $787 million to Fox? We can understand it this way. There is 1,000 million in 1 billion. At the end of last year, Fox had about $4.1 billion cash on hand. Bringing it down to more understandable numbers, if you have $4,100 cash on hand and offer to settle your...

Again off topic. The people on the tape have nothing to do with the Fox/Dominion case. About the case, I'm just sitting back to see what develops. When something factual develops in that case, that's of interest to me. I'm less interested in discussing random topics only tangentially related.

That's what you say and what Fox is arguing. How is that working for them so far?

That will change as Republicans impose more and more abortion restrictions.

Interesting question but off topic in this thread. In this thread, the appropriate question would be, "Did Fox News defame Dominion?"

Why do Republicans want to ban books they disagree with?

The Trial Issues "The [FOX] network 'intentionally and falsely' blamed Dominion for former President Donald Trump’s loss to President Joe Biden by broadcasting unsubstantiated claims about the company, including that it meddled with vote tallies, Dominion alleged. "Fox has maintained that the...

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/06/13/about-six-in-ten-americans-say-abortion-should-be-legal-in-all-or-most-cases-2/

If someone of any color in any community has lots of arrests and no convictions, that would leave us to wonder what's up. It could mean the police have it in for that person and they are abusing their powers. Or it could mean the person has an in with corrupt prosecutors. Or it could mean...

What was the case? Who or what entity was the complaintant? Who was charged?