Search results

No. Exceptions were written into the policy long before Trump was elected the first time. Of course there is no need. Anything MAGA can do to keep Trump from answering for his crimes is just fine.

I would not put great faith in that policy. An exception is written into it that allows DOJ to pursue a case where the evidence is fully developed, which it is in this case. In any event, October is months away and a lot can happen between now and then that makes this question of little...

Wow! SCOTUS to hear Trump's criminal immunity appeal. That will surprise many, including me. Now we wait to see how they will rule, and until the justices rule, we'll endure endless speculation about what they are thinking. Arguments are set for April 22. This will significantly delay the...

No Sympathy In their motion to the appellate court, Trump's attorneys said, "In the absence of a stay on the terms herein outlined, properties would likely need to be sold to raise capital under exigent circumstances, and there would be no way to recover any property sold following a successful...

You can compare cognition if you want to, and as you are able. I'm not much interested in Biden's cognitive ability. I've said before, his health is failing and he may well not be the Democratic candidate for president before this is all over. If Biden somehow makes it to Election Day, I expect...

That Was Fast; Trump Request to Stay Enforcement of $454 Million Judgement is Denied https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-plans-post-100-million-bond-asks-stay/story?id=107634579

That's right. Michigan is going blue.

Trump Admits He Cannot Post Full Bond for His NY Appeal "Former President Trump asked a New York appeals court to put on hold the enforcement of the multimillion dollar penalties he faces in his civil fraud case, suggesting he’d post a $100 million bond while the process plays out. "Trump’s...

That may be, but his analysis is credible. He's not the only one pointing to Trump's behavior changes and saying Trump is not the same man he was in 2016. DeSantis and Haley say the same. We can see this with our own eyes. Trump's tangential speech and phonemic paraphasias are easily seen on the...

Stand With Trump Has Stalled Out I've been following the progress of the GoFundMe account that was established by a Trump supporter to raise $355 million to help Trump pay the court-ordered judgement he earned by committing massive fraud for years. With interest already due, and new interest of...

It's unlikely that the judge will rule from the bench on Friday. Again, there is no denying the appearance of impropriety, but disqualifying Willis from the case will require more than that. A legal standard must be met for disqualification to be done. Lots of folks like to talk about how bad...

James may have gotten the message from those who criticized her trolling Trump like this. She has not posted an interest-due update since 2/25/24. Still, it's regrettable that she did this at all. It did not help her or anyone else.

Maybe the Fulton County RICO Case Can Get Back on Track Now We've watched a dust-up in recent weeks where Fani Willis critics hoped to see her disqualified from the above-mentioned case. Short story, the defendants failed to produce evidence sufficient to justify disqualification. No bombshell...

So am I. In that regard, James's taunting of Trump seems short-sighted and irresponsible. She worked hard to win this case. It makes no sense to me that she is now taunting Trump in the hearing of future judges or justices she may have on appeal. Her taunting is not illegal and it does not...

Shame on Letitia James After delivering a devastating blow to Trump by winning the massive civil fraud case she brought against him, NY AG James has taken up taunting Trump on Twitter (X) by posting daily reminders of the $112,000 dollars in interest that is accruing every day on the judgment...

This source you are citing, Phil Holloway; I have added him to the list of people I follow on Twitter. While he is clearly on the conservative side of the political spectrum, his comments are clear and logical.

More Accountability: Trump Pays New York Times https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-pays-392k-legal-fees-022201289.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr

In any major case, legal experts rise on both sides of the issue. That's what lawyers do. They pick a side and argue for it. If they are on the losing side, that does not make them non-experts. It does make their argument wrong. The experts could do as fine of a job arguing one side as the...

Seeing that Levin is his go-to source for info, we can also see why this is obvious.

Levin has posted fantasy legal advice like this before for Trump and his attorneys to follow. How much of it has been followed? And if it was followed, how effective was it?