Search results

If you find yourself at the Hook later, drop by and say hello. But not now; need a nap because I just know a run to Seattle is coming in a few hours. Round trip, too. So you didn't get the STL--Omaha or STL-- Houston runs, either, huh? Ok, speak up...who got 'em?

No, screw that. The GOP must first take into consideration how the candidates stand on freedom, economic issues, the rollback of socialism, etc. The man we nominate must be willing to fight for massive budget cuts, funding only Constitutional programs,.abolishing whole agencies and departments...

our rights were not created. our rights are inherent in ourselves and predate government.

I'm using voice transcription for much of this, so it won't look pretty. The State(s) are not the arbiter of rights. rights did not begin with the state, nor are they dependent on the state for their continued existence. when a state tramples on your rights, it doesn't mean the right goes away...

well, you're exaggerating our positions a bit, but here is the thing. our founding fathers and those that followed them correctly believed that their role was not to create law, but to discover law. as such, they wrote the bill of rights not as the government graciously granting us liberty out...

Sounds like a good reason, if nothing else, to see if he believes it.

that is supposed to read rick perry's f a I t h. voice transcription again. this excerpt is from chuck baldwin's latest newsletter, titled, "we don't need another george bush." ( yes, I know some of you don't like the formatting, so here is the link: Archived column: Chuck Baldwin Live |...

So...doctors should be enslaved, forced to provide their services for free our far below their value, or receive appropriate compensation, but with others enslaved to pay the bill? If you believe medical care is a right, to be provided without the receiver paying, you're enslaving or robbing...

First, I don't blindly accept the assertion that California had the best of everything, but I'm sure things were better than now. As for the abrupt change after Prop 13, the article leaves out a few very important things. After Prop 13, the California legislature had the opportunity to abolish...

That's the way it's supposed to be--I can't be required to ask to do it. When you have a right, and the government infringes on it like they do with guns or "free speech zones" (the very term should make your skin crawl), that's called tyranny and/or oppression. It's like if you get mugged on...

I just love these multi-tiered societies in which some people have more rights than others. Makes it even more galling when the same rights are guaranteed to all.

I believe the law says "separate from the ammunition." Don't remember if it's defined further than that.

Well, now wait a minute. What makes the chief of the state police a credible witness? Was he there? If he wasn't, that eliminates him as a witness at all, credible or otherwise. Are you imparting credibility solely on his office? If so, that's very foolish. If he wasn't there, he has no better...

I was going to criticize your statement based on the difference between "terrorize" and "terrorism," which, while similar, aren't exactly the same, though they come from the same transitive verb. But then I looked up the definition of terrorism, one of which, according to wikipedia, is this...

Here's the answer for that. Rick Perry signed into law a bill mandating injections of Gardasil for young girls, an injection that most won't need, of a drug with serious known side effects and several conjectured ones, and the real purpose of which was to enrich the pharmaceutical companies...

It's good to have that choice, that no one tries to make it for you. But that apparently works only one way. Anti-gun people want to decide for people who don't feel the same as you. As for the reasoning behind it, keep in mind that if an armed man wants your freight or your rig, or whatever...

Crazy-@$$ rust belt states...

If it's not in the wording, then what is the basis for the requirement? A whim?

The Federal Firearm Owners Protection Act mandates that no state may prosecute you for having a firearm in your possession if: • it's legal where you're coming from; • it's legal where you're going to; • you keep it locked up, inaccessible to the driver, separate from the...