Search results

Both political sides have used that phrase.

Are you claiming Obama's IQ is roughly 250? That would smash the World Record of 228.

Undermining conservatism.

Ok, got it.

How did you get sick getting drug test?

A lot of truth of what you say IRT, but McCain's fuel tank on his jet was hit by a missile from another plane. And regardless that McCain was a silver spooner, I mean, he still had to get into that jet by himself and fly into enemy territory. http://www.pythiapress.com/wartales/McCain-Shootdown.htm

Drug testing is required before a person is even offered a job. The USPS does this. A passed drug screen is required before an offer of employment is made. All applicants in a particular job such as driving, for example, are required to pass a drug screen before they can work for a company. One...

They were treated as such. ALL were allowed to take another test. Not categorized as a failed test in the final numbers even after failing the first time. The others that failed didn't retake the test. They weren't categorized as a failed test in the final numbers either.

All of them weren't considered failed drug tests, ( in the failed category) except for the three. The three took a second test and failed. The others retook the test, which allowed the drugs to dissipate. That and the poppy seeds. :rolleyes:

It would be a much more accurate way of finding drug users, but yes,there are constitutional issues. However, employers are allowed to screen all applicants with drug tests and they require employees to do random tests or they are let go.

But they weren't ultimately viewed as a positive test in the final statistic of failed tests, except for the three, because they were allowed to take a second test and failed. The others decided not to redo the test, but were not put in the fail column. Apparently because they weren't ultimately...

That is incorrect. I said if they really wanted a much more accurate testing result, test them all and then do random for at least a few months. It would provide a much more accurate picture. But again, I said I wasn't necessarily for testing in the first place. Merely commenting on the flawed...

I have reservations how much DES follows up on the paper trail and how much they coordinate with law enforcement. There is also nothing in the questionnaire that says giving a false answer will disqualify them from receiving benefits. There isn't a downside in lying on the questionnaire other...

Lol

There appears to be a few 'safeguards' that would help it significantly to be a 'tiny fraction'. As stated previously, the only ones tested are those who answer affirmative to drug use within last thirty days. One could just lie on the questionnaire and they would be omitted from taking the...

Except the Kerry lies.

Government overhead?:rolleyes:

So not much communication from law enforcement to DES . There would have to be some type of arrest record for drugs also. There is plenty of people that do drugs that don't have an arrest record. The questionnaire appears to be a big part of it though. Many recipients probably get wind of how to...

I checked out the link inside the article Cheri posted. Excerpt below: The reason so few people must take the test is because reasonable cause is needed, said Nicole Moon, a public information officer for DES. When someone is approved to receive welfare benefits in Arizona, that person is...