Search results

I heard he has his own jet. No biggie.

They just rationalize theirs as being “good trouble”.

Agree, they need to spell out in bold letters that an expelled member is banned from being able to be seated for designated length of time, no exceptions.

More on the previous post with link: https://aflegal.org/america-first-legals-investigation-reveals-the-biden-white-house-was-involved-with-the-mar-a-lago-raid-and-that-nara-misled-congress-afl-launches-additional-investigation/

Plus, the Biden Administration was involved with the raid on Trump and a contradiction from their public statements about it:

Fun facts: 1. The “Horns Fellow” otherwise known as the Shaman, who happens to be white, received a 41 month sentence( many months in solitary confinement too) after yelling in a bullhorn to an angry crowd to be “peaceful”. 2. The “con artists formerly known as The Expelled Two”, who happen to...

Yes, they failed to uphold it. It mentions successor in the constitution. A successor is someone that comes after the current seat holder. Not supposed to be the same person. That’s not a successor then. But instead of going through a whole lawsuit to clarify something that is obvious, they just...

It was correct. It’s just that the constitution is only as good as the will to abide by it and enforce it. And considering the Feds were conducting “oversight” on the Tennessee House and there was a lawsuit threatened, they decided to just move on. I’ll bet you don’t have a problem with that...

Congress has oversight responsibilities here: https://thegreggjarrett.com/braggs-lawsuit-against-congress-is-as-meritless-as-his-indictment-of-trump/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/04/12/manhattan-d-a-enlisted-a-whos-who-of-biden-admin-buddies-for-trump-takedown/

Thanks for enumerating one’s conformational bias.

They were allowed to return because they were voted back by their councils and commission. There is no evidence that they are racists, except in the fertile mind of The Left that sees race in everything.

That didn’t make it racist. These Democrats did something that wasn’t done in the 227 year history of the Tennessee House.

The two Justin Pearsons:

Apparently one House Republican decided to split hairs and voted accordingly, and against his other Republican colleagues who voted against the white woman . But instead of accepting that was the reason, it’s easier for someone to have a collective mentality and call them racists.

Aside from the actual facts of the vote were the deciding vote from one person (based on Ms. Johnson’s contriteness) was different than the rest who voted for the expulsion of the white woman. But facts are pesky sometimes. Her message before the vote distancing her actions from those of the...

New York mafioso court.

This is the same Democrat white woman that before the House vote for expulsion, distanced herself from the actions of the other two black fellows right? A vote she escaped by one vote because a House member was swayed by her perceived contriteness and culpability that she had highlighted in her...

What evidence do you have that it was a racist vote?

So what? News organizations are allowed to have surrogates from the losing party who were challenging the results of the election on their shows, and the comments they make, unless it’s some dictator country. What they have to say is still news. The hosts are not required to believe what every...