Search results

Not really answering the question.

The NY Prosecutor has on loan a Biden DOJ official. The DOJ likes to leak stuff.

Cut the Knotsie references. https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/08/defense-attorneys-allege-massive-misconduct-in-georgias-crumbling-get-trump-crusade/

Great! Prosecutors can leak and disparage Trump to the NYTimes about the case( without ANY repercussions) but he can’t exercise his First Amendment Right during the campaign season. Election Interference much?

We have a de facto reparations in a lot of ways already. I’m asking if there is enough Dems that would approve ANY dollar amount check sent to people as reparations?

The only debate Trump should appear in would be with Tucker as the moderator. Other than that, Trump should say No to debates. https://www.revolver.news/2023/05/checkmate-fox-news-tucker-carlson-host-gop-presidential-debates/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fox-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-media-matters-over-publicizing-leaked-tucker-carlson-footage_5245168.html

Is this definitively coming from Fox or someone that once worked there and leaked it to Media Matters? I notice Fox has issued a cease and desist order to MM to stop putting out Carlson videos. I would like to see him on Newsmax at 8pm. and also have some type of deal with Musk where he can have...

Are they against ANY reparations?

Fixed it: Unless you count the officer that unnecessarily panicked and shot the unarmed female protester.

Interesting tidbits :

Apparently no force is needed as well.

They were contingent electors in case they were needed. They weren’t used because the constitutional protected challenge failed. Why the Leftists are pursuing this nothing case is beyond me. Actually I know. Anything to try to get Trump. So they’ll try to do it in a deep blue area like Fulton...

Like the article said “confront” can be left to interpretation. He could be talking about his lawyers in court and wants to be present in the States while it comes to a conclusion. The case is Carroll v Trump, but his lawyers are representing him in court. It’s a nothingburger.

What purpose did Representative Jamie Raskin have by challenging the election by appearing before Congress and Vice President Biden? What authority did he have? The Electoral College Act. It’s not a story. It actually happened. It’s on tape. Except he didn’t have a Senator to sign off on it.

He gave a deposition already.

There is no secret. They challenged the election results pursuant to the Electoral College Act, similar to what Democrats did in the previous election.They were contingent Electors in case they were needed.

Everyone knows they were contingent electors except the ones playing stupid for political reasons.

Yes they do.