Search results

Have you seen the affidavit? Have you read the redacted affidavit released yesterday? What knowledge do you have about the affidavit contents? How do you know it contains false information?

Regarding "personal records," two points. First, unless the FBI occupied Mar-a-Lago for days while a filter team sorted through the boxes that were seized, it was impossible to quickly determine what records were personal and what were illegally possessed government property. We have learned...

That may be true if that was all there was to it, but there is more to it ... much more.

The Documents: Search Warrant and Redacted Affidavit For those who are interested in reading the Mar-a-Lago search warrant and the redacted Mar-a-Lago affidavit without media filter or spin, the links are below: Search Warrant Redacted Affidavit

You will recall that earlier this week, Trump sought out a conservative, Florida, Trump-appointed judge to whom he brought his request that a special master be appointed to examine the materials seized during the Mar-a-Lago search. After reading it, this judge identified several shortcomings in...

You cannot possibly know that "without the redactions, both would be exposed for their dishonesty." The only possible way to know that is to know what the full, unredacted document says; which you don't. You can easily assert dishonesty, but you cannot know the unredacted document will show...

He will defect to Russia before he serves time in a U.S. jail.

Two Predictions 1. Donald Trump will run for President in 2024, likely declaring his candidacy a year earlier. There was never any doubt about this. People who talk about something making it more likely or less likely that hey will run have it wrong. It is 100% likely he will run. It always...

If it can be proven that Trump is guilty of the crimes named in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant and supporting affidavit, attorneys can use it to get The Donald thrown in (to jail).

If the case has merit, it is not immediately evident to the person who matters the most; that is the conservative, Florida judge to who whom Trump brought the case. "On Tuesday, a Florida judge informed two lawyers representing former President Donald Trump, neither of them licensed in the...

Actually, no one can shop for a judge. There are rules in place that determine who gets what judge and when.

I'll wait for the additional information, expected on or before Friday, before I agree or disagree. It is interesting to note that Trump brought this action to a known-conservative, Florida judge who Trump himself appointed. She did not immediately agree that the action has merit. She asked for...

Regarding the delaying action initiated by Trump, you might want to wait until Friday before being so sure. The response he received from a judge today is not encouraging for Trump and his attorneys. The court filing has been declared laughable by some. It is quite something for a judge to ask...

No. The documents in question were and are the property of the United States. Classifed or not, Trump had no right to have them in Mar-a-Lago. The search warrant was executed in part to recover this U.S. government property that Trump had no right to have at Mar-a-Lago.

With over 95% of the votes counted, this race has been called. The winner is Democrat Pat Ryan; 51.9% to 48.1%. This result combined with the decisive statewide vote in Kansas that affirmed abortion rights adds credence to the idea that the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling against abortion...

Florida is packed with gated communities that are majority Republican. Most prominent example is The Villages.

Business owners do not have the right to refuse service, at least not in Florida under the laws established by DeSantis and the legislature at his behest. It is specifically prohibited by law for a Florida business to refuse service to anyone based on vaccination status. It is even prohibited...

Exactly as I said. Delaying action. May be effective in short term but not in the ultimate result, which in all likelihood is yet another loss in court and the search will be upheld as legal.

All talk, no action. Good for stirring up the Trump base. Trump does terrible in court. Based on past history, Trump is not likely to do anything in court beyond try to delay anything and everything he can. And he is certainly unlikely to present any rational and legal arguments that motivate...

Sad but true.