Search results

Except for the Mar-a-Lago warrant that was unsealed after Trump announced it and DOJ agreed to let it be unsealed, we do not yet know which judge issues which search warrants. Nor do we know on whom they were served or in which states or facilities or devices.

More Charges for Trump Plus a New Defendant The Miami grand jury is still investigating. Here's the latest: "Under the superseding indictment, prosecutors have charged Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira with two new obstruction counts based on allegations that they attempted to delete surveillance...

If Elections are About the Economy ...

It's Now Certain: Indictment Number Three is Coming Soon Lawyers for Donald Trump were told Thursday by prosecutors to expect an indictment against the former president in connection with his efforts to reverse his loss in the 2020 election, NBC News reported.

You don't get search warrants without demonstrating probable cause to a judge. The fact that they obtained eight search warrants means a lot of probable cause existed. Exactly where did it exist and who or what did it concern? We'll have to wait for the affidavits to be unsealed to find out.

It's a little early to think about that. DeSantis is still in the race and seems to want to stay in the race. He's not thinking much about Florida these days. He's full-on campaigning for president. If his present trajectory continues, and it's too early to know if it will, he will wash out of...

Oh Oh! Ron DeSantis scrapped two Hamptons fundraisers last weekend due to a lack of interest. (Source)

We Knew About One, but not the Other Seven Do you remember when the Mar-a-Lago search warrant was in the news and being energetically discussed here on EO? It now turns out there were seven other search warrants we did not even know about. News of those broke when a certain motion was unsealed...

Point taken. Post edited to change "sex worker" to "porn star."

It seems to me the teachers would tell the parents if they were permitted to do so. It's not the teachers withholding the truth. It's the rules that require the teachers to remain mum. About "dysphoria" and sexual identity, I don't want to get into that discussion here. We could go round and...

Something to Watch While the DeSantis campaign struggles to overcome its low ranking in the small-donor category, reckless spending (bloated staff, private jets), declining support in the polls, etc., DeSantis continues to enjoy the support of the hugely funded ($130 million, recently raised)...

The jury found Trump liable for defamation.

Joe Biden did not operate a corporation in New York that was convicted of tax fraud. Joe Biden did not defame E. Jean Carroll. Joe Biden did not fail to return classified documents when some were found in his home. Joe Biden did not get sued because he failed to pay attorney fees. Joe Biden...

You are not paying attention. Look before you post. https://www.expeditersonline.com/forums/threads/the-trump-card.66307/post-889743 https://www.expeditersonline.com/forums/threads/the-trump-card.66307/post-889594

I condone it? Are you not reading my posts? Are you not grasping the words? I explicitly do the opposite. I do not condone it. I condemn it. If I turned off a light, would you insist the light was on because I was the one who turned it off?

True. But that does not matter. What matters is the law and the facts, which is why Trump lost. In these cases, the law and the facts are not on his side. It does not matter how often you label certain courts, prosecutors, juries, etc. "Democrat." Trump continues to lose these battles. He's...

He seems to think so but the court disagreed. In the current Carroll case, the judge ruled that presidential immunity does not apply.

OK. Thank you for sharing. Three responses: 1. "... guidance (rules) that blocks parents from knowing whether their child identifies as a different gender in the classroom ..." is something quite different from the points you first raised; which is: "... the teaching of our young children that...

Yes, twice acquitted by the US Senate impeachment hearings. But those are not the recent court cases I am talking about. In those (Carroll, Brtagg, Smith, James), Trump has lost every issue he has raised in court.

I do remember that and you raise a valid point, as does Trump regarding this item. I have spoken elsewhere in this thread about the deep concerns I have regarding retroactive lawmaking. I expect Trump to raise this issue in court at the appropriate time. It is an important constitutional issue...