Communist Media, Proof Is In The Pudding

ratwell71 · Jun 14, 2008

Media Lies Proven,.. to Elect their chosen President, Ameri... - Care2 News Network

THE MEDIA TOOK THE FIRST STEP IN FIXING THE ELECTIONS. HOW? CENSORSHIP.

EVERYONE SHOULD BE UP IN ARMS EVEN IF YOU DON'T LIKE RON PAUL, WHY? BECAUSE IT SHOWS THE DIRECTION THIS COUNTRY IS HEADING IF WE CONTINUE TO ALLOW THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR.

FOX NEWS ARE COMMUNIST. I NO LONGER WATCH THIS CHANNEL. DO THE AMERICAN THING AND CENSOR THEM.

WATCH THE VIDEO PLEASE...

Turtle · Jun 14, 2008

Ron Paul has more videos uploaded to YouTube. Ron Paul has more search term hits. Therefore, Ron Paul is more popular as a candidate. Yet, the media refuses to treat Ron Paul "equally".

Based on these assertions from the video, the only logical conclusion is, since Ron Paul is more popular in spite of the lack of media coverage, that the media doesn't matter in the least, as no one is paying attention to them. So why are you, and anyone else, concerned about Ron Paul's lack of media coverage, since, as the video makes quite clear, the media doesn't matter?

Incidentally, if you go to Google Trends and compare Ron Paul, or any other candidate, to "shemale" you'll see that, clearly, despite a total lack of media coverage, we're going to elect a shemale for president.

Jayman · Jun 14, 2008

According to this video...it seems Jerry Day is as much a spinner as the "communist media". Unless I am missing something, he is making a big assumption. He asserts that just because Ron Paul has more videos (videos promoting Ron Paul + those discrediting him) online, that means more people would vote for him over the other candidates. Further more, he asserts that just because more people do a Google search on Ron Paul, that somehow proves all those people would vote for him. I call that a big assumption. Maybe people wanted to know more about him. But, maybe just maybe the more one found out about Ron Paul...the more they like one of the other candidates...