He uncovered it though.Jim Host - The Stupidest Man On The Internet - Super Sleuth ?
Who knew ???
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
You sure ?
With Ashli Babbitt Killing Shrouded in Mystery, Capitol Officer Who Shot Her Is in Hiding for His Own Safety
Paul Sperry might quibble with you on that ...
Hunter Biden's Ukraine and China deals were probably legal, and that's the problem
The last few weeks of non-stop coverage of the Trump impeachment inquiry has been shining a light on a disturbing practice that's been in place since long before this president ever took office, writes Jake Novak.
No Dems tell us all the time it's no big deal when they skirt them.I'm sure ... given WHO didn't pay them ...
Now, if it had been a Democrat ...
You don't even have to count those laws that were broken. What about weapons violationsHunter Biden's Ukraine and China deals were probably legal, and that's the problem
The last few weeks of non-stop coverage of the Trump impeachment inquiry has been shining a light on a disturbing practice that's been in place since long before this president ever took office, writes Jake Novak.www.cnbc.com
How about this one? Punishable up to 5 years in prison.Hunter Biden's Ukraine and China deals were probably legal, and that's the problem
The last few weeks of non-stop coverage of the Trump impeachment inquiry has been shining a light on a disturbing practice that's been in place since long before this president ever took office, writes Jake Novak.
Hunter Biden Reportedly Violated Federal Law by Lying on Background Check
Hunter Biden may have committed a felony offense by lying on a background check before purchasing a gun, Politico reported on Thursday. Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any...
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Not clear that any were.
What about weapons violations
How about this one? Punishable up to 5 years in prison.
Hunter Biden Reportedly Violated Federal Law by Lying on Background Check
Hunter Biden may have committed a felony offense by lying on a background check before purchasing a gun, Politico reported on Thursday. Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any...news.yahoo.com
Depends ... probably on whether he was still using or addicted at the time he applied for the background check, given the way the question is phrased in the article.
That's why the article says he may have.
You seem to treat it as a foregone conclusion that he did.
That's not clear from what I can see.
Where is the disagreement?You sure ?
With Ashli Babbitt Killing Shrouded in Mystery, Capitol Officer Who Shot Her Is in Hiding for His Own Safety
Paul Sperry might quibble with you on that ...
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
You claimed Gateway Pundit "uncovered" it ... as a news aggregator, I'm not so sure that's the case.
I don't see it much anywhere else so yeah they kind of did.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
What date did Gateway Pundit first report it vs. Paul Sperry ?
Looks like a day after with added details and pictures.
Also post on 6-30.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Interesting only in that it appears to be accurate ... unlike your rendition, which was that he didn't issue any commands.
Just because a recording device - in a different location than who commands were being directed at - doesn't pick something up, doesn't mean that the person they are directed to can't hear them.
danthewolf00
Veteran Expediter
Yet you can't hear the cop from the video in the stair well.....all you hear is people shouting.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
That's his and the officer's account that he did give a command. The lawyer continued on though explaining why no one on the other side of the glass could hear him: 1. The glass barrier, 2 many people yelling and making a lot of noise. 3. He had a mask on which would muzzle the sound and articulation of any supposed command. I previously mentioned all three of these issues. But regarding the recording device, the location of it was near the victim and it would AMPLiFY the sounds including the supposed officers command, yet NO officer commands could be heard on the video.Interesting only in that it appears to be accurate ... unlike your rendition, which was that he didn't issue any commands.
Just because a recording device - in a different location than who commands were being directed at - doesn't pick something up, doesn't mean that the person they are directed to can't hear them.
Last edited:
Yep, a video with a recording device to pickup nearby sounds.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Not only was it his and the officer's account, but it was also attested to by other officers and witnesses who were there.
That isn't what he explained at all - that's merely your own concoction of what you wish he said ... based on what he really said:
Nothing whatsoever "explaining why no one on the other side of the glass could hear him" ...
Try harder ... and do better.
Not necessarily.
It would depend on whether there were any intervening barriers between the mic (of the recording device) and the officer, and - depending on the type of mic on the recording device - whether the mic was capable of picking up sound in more than one direction (other than the direction the recording device was pointed)
Unidirectional vs. Omnidirectional Microphones - What's the difference?
Last edited: