Search results

That's our Hooch. I've been tempted to give him away, especially when he takes off after whatever his nose gets scent of, and I have to chase him down, BUT, Hooch is Lindas' pup and that wasnt gonna happen. He is a good family dog.

This was the caption with it: Solent RV Concept: Solar Powered Hybrid Electric Camper with Car

And away we goooooo!!!

Well my cover has been blown. I confess, I AM, J.J. Thats right, I am, J.J. J.J. is just me. I'm just mad about J.J. J.J. maad about meeee. Oh.................J.J. stands for: ..... just jokin.

YAWN.......boring. Tata.

Well, one thing is for sure, NO PROOF or DOCUMENTATION. Just a lot of hot air as you continue spout opinion.

"I believe states that make you chain up will want the entire axle chained which the Insta-Chains only go under the inside tire. These are a dangerous item because they will make a driver think he has the traction of a truck that has chained up but clearly they do not." And your proof is...

Your OPINION is just that, opinion. Not fact. You are quoting others and that does not justify your beliefs as fact. To many good drivers on EO with ACTUAL experience say otherwise. Oh did I mention that this truck has ATD. Yep, it does. Now our old truck didnt have ATD we used chains. In five...

Or those that value their lives and are only trying to get safely to an exit.

Ahhh, gotcha. I see where you are coming from. Its not the speed you travel BUT the percentage of difference in relation to the vehicles around you. Why didnt I see this before. So, if I use you logic (sic) I am safer traveling 110 with other vehicles going 125 cause that would only be an...

On the legal side yes WSDOT would be best to get the answer from. I guess if what you write isnt your philosophy, my bad. Oh, FYI: phi·los·o·phy  noun, plural phi·los·o·phies the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct.

Oh, so you are saying some vehicles traveling at 70 vs others at 55 is safer than vehicles traveling 30 and 15. I cant wait for this response.

http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/EE2D33C7-E6A0-4C58-9BD9-AE05C003B327/0/VehicleGuide.pdf Here is a booklet issued by WSDOT. Its got DIAGRAMS and everything.

So, would a 2nd set of OnSpot discs, in a tool box, full fill Phils philosophy?

Ahhh, Phil, you should of read my last posting 2 minutes b4 yours. But, We are 100% correct, AGAIN.

Minimum Chain Requirement All vehicles over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) shall carry a minimum of two (2) extra chains for use in the event that road conditions require the use of more chains or in the event that chains in use are broken or otherwise made useless, WAC 204-24-050...

Curious. ONSPOT is D.O.T. approved in all states, including the mountainous chain control areas of Colorado and California. OnSpot - The Automatic Tire Chain Why would ONSPOT lie about this. Somebody better tell them paullud says they are not legal in every state. He knows.

Did I ever mention that we have automatic chains on our truck ( I know I have ). Well, I got to tell ya, when I slow down like I am pulling over to a chain up area, when I get to 20 or 25mph and push the button, the chains deploy a lot faster than any truck that has to continue to a dead stop to...

Thats exactly what I will tell the CHIP officer when he asks me why I was doing 70 when its posted 55 for trucks.

TOUCHE, well don zorry, well done.