The Ted Cruz And Kids Cartoon.

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Offline
1) Had I seen Chelsea or Amy mouthing words they couldn't have understood the meaning of [politically], my opinion would be the same: it's not good parenting.
2) There comes a point when outside interference is required [Tonya Couch comes to mind, just now], but I wasn't proposing anyone interfere with how Cruz or any politician raises their kids - merely saying I don't feel it's good parenting.
3) Effective? I consider it as effective as when Cruz read 'Green Eggs and Ham', lol. And I'm far from alone in that.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Offline
Ted Cruz already sounds like a televangelist when he talks. Maybe we'll get to see him crying like a disgraced televangelist soon, too.

Personally, I don't believe there is any possible way that Ted Cruz has had sex with six women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greasytshirt

iceroadtrucker

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Offline
Attacking a politician's minor kids, instead of the politician, is pretty lame, no matter how involved and visible the kids are in the campaign. Because, like you said, kids can't understand what's going on. If they're 18, then it's a different deal, because they can participate or not.

Politicians have been using their kids in political campaigns since at least John Adams. They do it mainly to show they're a "family man." Or, more recently, a "family woman" (see Palin, Sarah). But every time I see a politician parade his children out on a campaign, all I can think is, "Oh, look, his dick works." Which is probably not the thought and feeling they're attempting to engender.

Turtle was it fare when they did it to Ross Perot Family? I don't think so the Media did it would not leave his daughter alone.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Offline
Unless the children are adults and have inserted themselves into a campaign, they should be off limits. To be fair, though, the attacks on Perot's family came mostly from the Bushes and the media reported it.

Is Ted Cruz being Cruzified on Good Friday? Enquiring minds want to know!

Too many jokes.
 

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Offline
Still have to admire Trump some. It was Cruz or his Superpac that went after Trumps wife. Then they complain when he comes back after them with both barrels loaded. Cruz started it. I love politics. :D
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Offline
It's probably true about Cruz. People often dismiss the National Inquirer as just made up tabloid trash, but they usually get it correct IMO. The truth may not be 'verified' for days, weeks, or years about something they have published, but eventually it does. Regarding the Cruz story, if at least part of it is true (One or two affairs) then it could finish Cruz. The GOP establishment 'smart set' consultants wanted this to come out weeks ago when their guy Rubio was still in the race. They were clamoring for this information to be released 'yesterday' so they could finish off Cruz and have Rubio as the alternative to Trump.(see video below that sums up their frustration of that.) Now they are left with a possibly damaged Cruz campaign and the Trump campaign with astronomical negatives and baggage with their candidate. Two damaged leading candidates now and still hope for the establishment to weasel in their hand picked candidate. A calamity in the making...
 
Last edited:

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Offline
Still have to admire Trump some. It was Cruz or his Superpac that went after Trumps wife. Then they complain when he comes back after them with both barrels loaded. Cruz started it. I love politics. :D
Lyla Trump 3 Cruz.jpg
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Offline
After watching this video, you'll never be able to watch Ted Cruz again the same way again. If you're a fan of Cruz don't watch it, because you can never unsee it.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Moot

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Offline
It was the National Enquirer that broke the John Edwards scandal when none of the mainstream media would touch it - him being the liberal darling that he was;)
 

iceroadtrucker

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Offline
The debate over whether or not Senator Ted Cruz is eligible for the U.S. Presidency is about to end. It has now been confirmed that Senator Ted Cruz is neither a “U.S. natural born Citizen” or a “legal U.S. citizen.”

According to all relative legal citizenship documentation available at present, Senator Ted Cruz was born Rafael Edward Cruz, a legal citizen of Canada on December 22, 1970 and maintained his legal Canadian citizenship from birth until May 14, 2014, 43 years later.

The Cruz Campaign for the U.S. Presidency has claimed that Senator Ted Cruz was a “citizen at birth” via his U.S. mother and a “dual citizen” of both Canada and the United States in 1970 and that by renouncing his Canadian citizenship in 2014, he would become eligible for the Oval Office.

There are several problems with this claim… which make the claim false

“citizen at birth” is a 14th Amendment naturalization term based upon “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
Senator Cruz was born in Canada, subject to the jurisdiction of Canada. Further, any U.S. citizen by virtue of the 14th Amendment only, is a “citizen” and not a “natural born Citizen,” as you will see below. (Source is Cornell Law on the 14th)

“dual citizenship” was prohibited in Canada in December 1970. (Source is Canadian Law)
From May 22, 1868 until December 31, 1946, all residents of Canada were British subjects. There was no such thing as a Canadian citizen or Canadian citizenship until January 1, 1947.

From January 1, 1947 until February 15, 1977, Canadian law prohibited “dual citizenship.” Foreign parents giving birth to a child in Canada in 1970 were forced to choose between Canadian citizenship only, or citizenship in another country, and to declare that with Canadian officials at the time of birth. The parents of Ted Cruz chose and declared “Canadian citizenship” for Rafael Edward Cruz.

United States laws make it possible to be a legal U.S. citizen by only the following means:
a) NATURAL BORN CITIZEN – “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.” (The Natural Law as understood by the Founders in Article II of the US Constitution)

b) NATIVE BORN CITIZEN – All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. (The 14th Amendment definition for “citizen”

c) NATURALIZED CITIZEN – the legal act or process by which a non-citizen in a country may acquire citizenship or nationality of that country. It may be done by a statute, without any effort on the part of the individual (aka anchor baby), or it may involve an application and approval by legal authorities, (such as a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) form filed with the US State Department at the time of birth). (This includes “anchor baby” or “citizen at birth” born here or abroad, under the 14th) Source is U.S. State Department.

“Dual citizens” are prohibited from being “natural born Citizens” as it pertains to Article II requirements for the Oval Office.
As the stated purpose of the Article II “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office is to prevent anyone with foreign allegiance at birth from ever occupying the Oval Office, and all “dual citizens” at birth are born with “dual national allegiance” at birth. The mere condition of “dual citizen at birth” would be a direct violation of the known purpose and intent of the natural born Citizen requirement in Article II. Source is a letter from Founder John Jay in proposing the NBC requirement for the Oval Office.



Now, Senator Ted Cruz has repeatedly stated that he has never “naturalized” to the United States, which eliminated the possibility that Ted Cruz is a “naturalized” U.S. Citizen.

Senator Ted Cruz has also documented the fact that he was not a “native born citizen” of the United States, but rather a “native born citizen” of Canada on December 22, 1970, who maintained his legal Canadian citizenship until May 14, 2014.

All of this explains why Senator Ted Cruz has no legal U.S. citizenship documentation of any kind…

The Harvard opinion letter written by two of Senator Cruz’s Harvard friends, Neal Katyal & Paul Clement, a mere “commentary” on the subject, relies upon the 14th Amendment naturalized citizen at birth concept, despite the fact that Ted Cruz was not “born in or under the jurisdiction of the United States,” was never “naturalized” to the United States, and completely ignoring the fact that Canada prohibited “dual citizenship” in 1970, as well as the fact that “dual citizenship” alone would prevent him from “natural born U.S.” status.

All of this explains why Senator Ted Cruz has no legal U.S. citizenship documentation of any kind. He is not a “natural born” – “native born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States. Because someone must be one of the three in order to be a legal citizen of the United States, Senator Ted Cruz cannot possibly be a “legal U.S. citizen” of any form.

Only days ago, a 17-year-old first time voter at a New Hampshire town hall meeting for Senator Ted Cruz asked a very reasonable question… “How and why, until recently, were you unaware that you were a Canadian citizen?”

As the young man explained, this is not an eligibility question, but a credibility question… which Senator Cruz refused to answer, preferring instead to regurgitate the talking points carefully crafted by his Harvard friends and eventually, shouting the young man down, after a Cruz fan in the audience shouted “better a Canadian than a Kenyan!” (VIDEO) Meanwhile, a growing number of Constitutional Law Professors agree, “Cruz is NOT eligible.”

Of course, Senator Marco Rubio is also “ineligible,” as a “native born citizen at birth” by virtue of 14th Amendment “anchor baby” policies only.

In the end, the only possible way to consider Senator Ted Cruz eligible for the Oval Office is if every “undocumented resident alien” is eligible for the Oval Office, which I personally believe is the real agenda of both political parties, as they work to meld the USA into the global commune where there is no legal difference between “natural born Americans” and “undocumented aliens.”

The fact that so many Americans do not know or care to know the truth about the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, demonstrates just how far down the road of “hope and change” for the destruction of the Constitutional Republic, the enemy within has already achieved.

Soon, “natural born Americans” will be in the American minority… and they will be ruled by foreigners who have no legal U.S. citizenship at all.

Credits: JB Williams
 
Top