Jobless rate soars to 9.7% 216,000 jobs lost in August

oncedrove

Expert Expediter
WASHINGTON — The unemployment rate rose to 9.7% in August, the highest since June 1983, as employers eliminated a net total of 216,000 jobs.

Analysts expect businesses will be reluctant to hire until they are convinced the economy is on a firm path to recovery. Many private economists, and the Federal Reserve, expect the unemployment rate to top 10% by the end of this year.

While the jobless rate rose more than expected, the number of job cuts is less than July’s upwardly revised total of 276,000 and the lowest in a year, according to Labor Department data released today. Economists expected the unemployment rate to rise from July’s 9.4% to 9.5% and job reductions to total 225,000.

If laid-off workers who have settled for part-time work or have given up looking for new jobs are included, the underemployment rate reached 16.8%, the highest on records dating from 1994.

The recession has eliminated a net total of 6.9 million jobs since it began in December 2007. There are now 14.9 million Americans unemployed.

Other economic data released this week has been positive. The Institute for Supply Management, a trade group, said Tuesday that the manufacturing sector grew in August for the first time in 19 months. On Thursday, the ISM said its service sector index rose to 48.4 last month, the highest level in nearly a year. Home sales, meanwhile, have increased for several months and prices are stabilizing.

Federal Reserve policymakers said in minutes from an August meeting that they expect the economy to recover in the second half of this year. But labor market conditions are still “poor,” the Fed minutes released Wednesday said, and many companies are likely to be “cautious in hiring” even as the economy picks up.

Some economists credit the Obama administration’s $787-billion economic stimulus package of tax cuts and spending increases, along with the Cash for Clunkers program, with contributing to a recovery. But they worry about what will happen when the impact of the stimulus efforts fades next year.

Vice President Joe Biden defended the stimulus package Thursday against Republican critics who say it is too costly.

“The recovery act has played a significant role in changing the trajectory of our economy, and changing the conversation in this country,” Biden said. “Instead of talking about the beginning of a depression, we are talking about the end of a recession.”

_____________________________________________________________

This says it all!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Republicans criticized Biden’s speech. “The Democrats’ rhetoric on their economic experiment doesn’t match with the reality of millions of Americans remaining unemployed,” said Republican Party chief Michael Steele. “The stimulus was an economic experiment that failed Americans.”
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
I absolutely disagree with Joe "look there's an Indian" biden.

The real reason for some of this "recovery" is because the banking and credit industries have moved. It is not because of the $89 billion spent so far out of $786 billion.

So far they have spent the money this way;

$28 billion to Medicaid
$19 billion to unemployment payments
$10 billion to educational programs
$4 billion to student financial assistance
$1 billion to rental assistance
The balance on the local and state projects

Not to mention they extended cobra and reduced withholding taxes which they count as stimulus money but it is not.

Medicaid money was not all spent on the people, a lot of the money went to shore up stupid programs, some of it went to raises and bonuses.

The education programs were not needed, the money was given to hire more teachers targeting failing schools.

Why shift the burden onto the students? This only benefits the teachers and schools, not the students.

And so on.

Biden and others are claiming that because they handed the "poor" money they were not smart enough to save it but they spent it and this helped the economy. But many of the so called poor haven't had enough money to effectlvy spend the recession away, and to be exact a lot of economist are puzzled by the reports from the congress and whitehouse while they see different in the economy. The media doesn't help, saying it is great news to see a reduction in unemployement filings while many of us are now considered poor but without benefits. What is worst is their redefining "recovery", using these programs as the right way to go and assuming that employment always lags behind, they fail to see that some sectors of manufacturing will never recover or hire back - automotive is one.
 
Top