Search results

Good luck with the new gig Sue. Don't be a stranger, it was great having you around.

Very true in that the exemption doesn't apply, but I see them attempting some of the same arguments. The way courts rule nowadays, it is hard to say never on anything.

Something like this case will eventually get challenged. Especially if they use some of the arguments out of the recent Hobby Lobby case.

So are you saying you want two wrongs to make a right?

Surprised he is not supported by the gay community. Nothing more than reverse discrimination.

The idea that there were not "weapons of mass destruction" was just political. They were there the whole time. It was reported in 06 but dismissed by the media with another agenda. We had a relative over there as well with the Coast Guard and one of their functions were to provide security at...

They have become so predictable.

If one is worried about "bambooziling" people I would look no farther than our federal government. Religion of any type doesn't even come close. That is where I would put the focus if one is concerned.

Regardless of what side of the fence you are on, those people giving money to churches are often and many times used for a variety of charities. Not likely to find that coming out of the gay or non religious/atheist communities in the same portions. Doesn't mean they are bad, but they are in no...

If one is not religious, I don't know why they would care what the religious folks do with their money or anything else for that matter. No real reason for concern unless they demand you give to the church. Look at it as giving money for the causes of global warming.

What kind of government would we be if we started taxing "Time of trouble beans" & "End of the world gravy"? :cool: Disgraced televangelist now selling food for the apocalypse | Fox News

Naw...nothing grows up there. :cool: