Search results

Never heard of them?

First time could be a misunderstanding. Second time should be a recorded call.

He likely was signed on at Panther and running some LRT freight which is allowed. We have ran all kinds of freight for different carriers.

Not sure how it works on vans, but for CDL drivers most go through DAC. A charge of abandoning freight or a vehicle is likely going to kill some job chances for quite some time.

If he is still recruiting, it would sure seem like fraud since he has made a public announcement of going out of business. Like anything, a unproven business is going to carry more risk. Just no way around it regardless of the business. Even more so in a turbulent economy. Take the...

I didn't close the thread, but we have had several threads going on that all saying the same thing. I think closing it was the right thing to do as nothing productive is being generated from posts that same the same thing. The guy is out of business, so at this point, that is the end of it...

Maybe time for another reality check. Over the last six months or so, the multi-carrier arrangement has been all the rage by a select few. I believe the reality is there can be some gains for drivers that can't find that ability to keep moving from one carrier. Without a doubt, these are...

Keep it simple. If you were wronged, then hire a lawyer. The guy is currently out of business. The freight fairy isn't going to collect your money owed for you. Operate like a business. If you are owed, then hire a lawyer. Anything else is basically whining if you aren't able to take...

Get a lawyer and get your name added to the list of creditors. May get something, may get nothing. Depends on what he has left if anything and in what order and how much a judge decides on each claim.

You mean a master at BS'ing? I would watch to see if they pop up again under another name.

When looking at the smaller unknown carriers, one almost has to look at them with expecting 80 percent of the line haul. If it is the same or lower than other carriers, then the question becomes, why take a higher risk for the same money as a known entity? At the end of the day, no company is...

Think I would wait until they have a proven track record of success. No need to gamble your money with a new carrier that may or may not produce. If you are going to do that, might be better off being the carrier.

There is a nameless carrier in Chicago that operates under several names as well. Stories like these have a way of repeating themselves.

Hope they all got paid.