How long till this starts hitting expedited carriers?

jelliott

Veteran Expediter
Motor Carrier Executive
US Army
Fleet Failures Rise Sharply
First-Quarter Figure Nearly Matches All of 2015
TruckFleetFailures.jpg


This story appears in the April 18 print edition of Transport Topics.

Fleet failures rose sharply in the first quarter as slackening demand, stagnant freight rates and other factors sidelined 3,585 trucks, about three times more than the same quarter last year as well as the final three months of 2015, according to a new Avondale Partners report.

Failures totaled 1,025 in the first quarter of last year and 1,380 in the fourth quarter.

The first-quarter 2016 failures were the highest since the third quarter of 2014, Avondale analyst Donald Broughton told Transport Topics, and approached the lowest-ever full-year total of 4,405 trucks that was recorded last year.

“Conditions have become more challenging,” he said April 12. “Fuel no longer is down every week. Residual values [for trucks] have plummeted. Freight is not as plentiful. Pricing power is nonexistent. Carriers that were just managing to get by during a great time when things were fabulous are now at risk.”

Last year’s failures were “so abnormally low” that it was easy to predict that they would pick up from 2015’s all-time lows, Broughton said.

“Things were so good in 2014 and early in 2015 that they could only get worse,” the Avondale analyst said, citing a market that was “almost perfect,” with good freight demand, high rates, low fuel prices and strong residual values for trucks.

That combination resulted in margin enhancement and a cash flow windfall that buoyed fleets, making it nearly impossible to kill a trucker financially, he added.

American Trucking Associations Chief Economist Bob Costello said, “While the numbers are up from the fourth quarter and first quarter of 2015, they remain quite low historically.” For example, the 2014 total was nearly 30,000 trucks in failed fleets, which in turn was far below the 61,975 reduction in the U.S. truck fleet in 2010, based on reports compiled by Broughton.

“I do believe that the relatively higher numbers are reflective of a truck freight market with softer demand growth and more capacity available,” Costello said. “As a result, conditions have become a little more difficult for fleets without much cushion.”

A wide range of numbers illustrates the shift in the trends. While diesel prices bottomed out in mid-February, they have risen in seven of the past eight weeks. More increases are looming as crude oil prices have jumped more than 50% since hitting their lowest point two months ago. On the used-truck market, prices are down 25% or more since December, Broughton said.

Avondale and Cass Information Systems’ index of truckload rates has slipped from an average increase of 5.2% in the first half of last year to 2.5% in the second half. Over the past three months, rates have risen less than 1% in each month. Given that trajectory, Broughton now predicts that freight rates on average this year will be between 2% higher and 1% lower.

From an earnings and cash flow standpoint, the slippage in used-truck prices is notable, Broughton said, since some publicly traded fleets can derive 30% to 50% of their profits from used-truck sales.

While fuel, pricing, freight demand and used-truck prices affect the trend in fleet failures, the overall supply and demand trends remain the most important, Broughton said, because all of the other factors are dependent on the supply-demand balance.

Given current market conditions, Broughton said he believes failure rates will remain higher in 2016 than 2015, though he shied away from citing a percentage.

“There is a real potential for failures to get noticeably worse this year, depending on supply and demand and diesel prices,” he said.

One factor that won’t come into play this year, the Avondale analyst said, is the federal mandate for fleets to install electronic logging devices by the end of 2017. The reason, he said, is that fleets that haven’t already installed that equipment will wait until the last possible moment to do so, given the current pricing environment.

“With shippers sending out massive amounts of bid requests now to get rates lowered,” he said, “why would anyone think shippers are ready to be charged more so that a fleet can pay for ELDs?”

At the same time, Broughton said, with a weak rate environment, there is strong pressure for fleets that don’t have ELDs to wait and hope that pricing improves.

As a result, he said, ELDs won’t affect fleet failures until the fourth quarter of next year, when they become mandatory, or the first quarter of 2018.

However, Broughton added, “This round of failures … may look minuscule once EOBRs are enforced on a ‘wholesale’ basis.”



By Rip Watson

Senior Reporter
 
  • Like
Reactions: sflint

jelliott

Veteran Expediter
Motor Carrier Executive
US Army
It would help our segment !!!!!!

Supply and demand has a way of balancing itself that is true over time. BUT.....too often in our industry it is the owner operators that are the ones that don't get paid.
 

BobWolf

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
What is this guy talking abbout "great times for the industry" Most of us are just getting by at best, just making it. I had a clown ask me to make a weekly round trip 2 - 3 skids 200 miles each way and expected me to do it for 100 bucks.
 

guido4475

Not a Member
Supply and demand has a way of balancing itself that is true over time. BUT.....too often in our industry it is the owner operators that are the ones that don't get paid.
A perfect example of the owner operator not getting paid is what recently happened to a multi-carrier friend of mine. He had 2 unpaid loads totaling over 2 grand, only to get an e-mail and several un- answered calls, etc to and from one of his carriers stating they have ceased operations. He's been trying to chase his money since than. Oddly enough, when I looked that carrier up on the FMCSA website, it was listed as a one truck operation. I think the smaller, inexperienced carriers and drivers leased to these companies are the ones that will take the hit the hardest, as they cannot absorb as big of a financial loss as the bigger, more stable carriers can. I see them dropping like flies, one by one, the smaller carriers. It's time for a cleansing of this over saturated industry anyways. The pie can only be sliced into so many pieces before people starve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fastman_1

akkshole

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
US Air Force
Nope, that was just getting rid of redundant jobs and remote terminals.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
when they eliminate stupid...and logistic errors it might effect us.....you can't fix stupid but you can lay them off...LOL

by the very nature of expedite....shippers, logistics managers, stores people will make a mistake, machines will still breakdown thats why you can file away them speadsheets....you have better chance to predict a volcano then expedite....
 

ntimevan

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Thru a social media site, Bolt has closed its doors in Dallas. Or is closing..
When i was with Bolt that so-called Dallas office was nothing but a drop & hook stop for single driver TT moving Nogalez or Laredo loads ...
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I have been seeing a steady increase in the number of people between myself and the shipper ...shippers I have talked to were paying the same rate they paid three years ago yet our rate is in decrease?
Hopefully we can decrease the number of fingers in the pie
 
  • Like
Reactions: hazmat

Murraycroexp

Veteran Expediter
I have been seeing a steady increase in the number of people between myself and the shipper ...shippers I have talked to were paying the same rate they paid three years ago yet our rate is in decrease?
Hopefully we can decrease the number of fingers in the pie

Yep, it's apparent that many loads have 4-6+ layers from the truck to the checkbook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hazmat and ntimevan
Top