Inexcusable murder

LDB · Jul 6, 2015

cheri1122 said:
I've long said that we need to secure our borders, or they're pointless. That said, once someone is here, it's a tough problem, because the solutions are both expensive and ineffective. [The idea of capital punishment for the crime of wanting a better life is the product of a sick mind, IMO]. Ship them home? Waste of money, when they just come back. It's even tougher when the bring kids - how do we blame kids for escaping poverty however they can?
One other thing: anchor babies is a concept we need to change, because it just invites abuse.

That's the problem with liberal minds. They can't comprehend. Nobody said anything about punishing wanting a better life. Everyone should want a better life. Specifically, it's punish those who have illegally entered and not just once but multiple times. Proven with DNA on file. Having been informed fully and completely beforehand that a repeat offense would be a capital offense. Legally applying and following the law to get a better life would carry no punishment, only the repeated violation of our sovereignty and laws.

Unclebob · Jul 6, 2015

LDB said:
That's the problem with liberal minds. They can't comprehend. Nobody said anything about punishing wanting a better life. Everyone should want a better life. Specifically, it's punish those who have illegally entered and not just once but multiple times. Proven with DNA on file. Having been informed fully and completely beforehand that a repeat offense would be a capital offense. Legally applying and following the law to get a better life would carry no punishment, only the repeated violation of our sovereignty and laws.

We could call it the Final Solution Law.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ragman · Jul 6, 2015

Unclebob said:
We could call it the Final Solution Law.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No we can't!!!!!!

Unclebob · Jul 6, 2015

Ragman said:
No we can't!!!!!!

If we're going to have an immoral law we should a name that reflects the sentiment.

Ragman · Jul 6, 2015

Unclebob said:
If we're going to have an immoral law we should a name that reflects the sentiment.

Ah, got ya!

paulnstef39 · Jul 6, 2015

Then we can process them and turn them into soylent green, and solve the hunger problem at the same time.

cheri1122 · Jul 6, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
Then we can process them and turn them into soylent green, and solve the hunger problem at the same time.

You & UncleBob are having fun with the extremist notion of killing people who enter illegally [even multiple times], but since the OP is dead serious, it's not beyond possibility that some [many?] would agree with him. Then they lecture on "the problem with liberal minds" when we disagree, lol.

Unclebob · Jul 7, 2015

Unfortunately there are too many in America that would agree with the OP. Hatred takes a terrible toll on a persons mind. It can cause a decent and compassionate person too consider unthinkable evil. We must all be vigilant in our thoughts and actions to minimize hatred. Hatred is inside all of us and nobody can eliminate it but it can be controlled and minimized.

BTW if you feel you don't have any hatred please let us know so we can tell the world of the Second Comming.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

scottm4211 · Jul 7, 2015

They think they agree with him but it's an easy position to take behind a keyboard. I don't see him stepping up to pull the switch.

OntarioVanMan · Jul 7, 2015

One of the root causes of this problem...the anchor baby rule......change it now... stop creating a continuing problem.

muttly · Jul 7, 2015

I'm for a law that would imprison someone for 5 years after they reentered the country after being deported.

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/653727

OntarioVanMan · Jul 7, 2015

muttly said:
I'm for a law that would imprison someone for 5 years after they reentered the country after being deported.

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/653727

I am not sure about imprison them at our cost after the first time....first we MUST secure that border...once secured I could be more comfortable with that idea...But I really don't want a border like the "Wall" either...

Ragman · Jul 7, 2015

OntarioVanMan said:
..But I really don't want a border like the "Wall" either...

Walls don't work...... Never have, never will.

paulnstef39 · Jul 7, 2015

anchor baby = american citizen Where do you suggest we go from there?

OntarioVanMan · Jul 7, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
anchor baby = american citizen Where do you suggest we go from there?

Cancel that law....if neither parent isn't a citizen neither is the child... even tho born here...close that loophole....

Ragman · Jul 7, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
anchor baby = american citizen Where do you suggest we go from there?

We should pass an amendment making anchor babies Canadian citizens.

muttly · Jul 7, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
anchor baby = american citizen Where do you suggest we go from there?

Anchor baby= not American citizen

paulnstef39 · Jul 7, 2015

Would requ

muttly said:
Anchor baby= not American citizen

WRONG! Anyone born in US other than children of Diplomats of other countries is a natural born US citizen.

muttly · Jul 7, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
Would requ

WRONG! Anyone born in US other than children of Diplomats of other countries is a natural born US citizen.

I know. You missed my point. You asked where do we go from there? My answer was to make anchor babies not American Citizens.(anchor babies= not American Citizens)

Ragman · Jul 7, 2015

paulnstef39 said:
Would requ

WRONG! Anyone born in US other than children of Diplomats of other countries is a natural born US citizen.

You have to remember, that is the part of the Constitution the right wingers don't support.

Their motto is ..... Support only the parts of the Constitution you agree with......the rest blame the left.