ExpeditersOnline.com
Try Hours
Bolt Express
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    White Lake, MI
    Posts
    72

    Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    I was asked to provide the documentation I received from the FMCSA when I questioned them regarding OFF DUTY/DRIVING Regs. I gave examples to the FMCSA of using the truck to go to the store, (between loads) to playing tourist for weekend, (between loads). The verbal answer was as follows: You do not have change your "OFF DUTY" status to use your truck for personal transportation if; 1) You Do Not Have Freight On Board, 2) You Have Met Your Sleep Requirement.
    He also confirmed it does not matter if you are a straight truck, bobtail, or tractor trailer. There is NO gray area here.

    After our conversation he e-mailed me the interpretations listed below.

    Per your request:

    49 CFR §395.2

    Question 2: What conditions must be met for a CMV driver to record meal and other routine stops made during a tour of duty as off-duty time?

    Guidance:
    1. The driver must have been relieved of all duty and responsibility for the care and custody of the vehicle, its accessories, and any cargo or passengers it may be carrying.

    2. The duration of the driver’s relief from duty must be a finite period of time which is of sufficient duration to ensure that the accumulated fatigue resulting from operating a CMV will be significantly reduced.

    3. If the driver has been relieved from duty, as noted in (1) above, the duration of the relief from duty must have been made known to the driver prior to the driver’s departure in written instructions from the employer. There are no record retention requirements for these instructions on board a vehicle or at a motor carrier’s principal place of business.

    4. During the stop, and for the duration of the stop, the driver must be at liberty to pursue activities of his/her own choosing and to leave the premises where the vehicle is situated

    Question 20: How must a driver record time spent on-call awaiting dispatch?

    Guidance:
    The time that a driver is free from obligations to the employer and is able to use that time to secure appropriate rest may be recorded as off-duty time. The fact that a driver must also be available to receive a call in the event the driver is needed at work, even under the threat of discipline for non-availability, does not by itself impair the ability of the driver to use this time for rest.

    If the employer generally requires its drivers to be available for call after a mandatory rest period which complies with the regulatory requirement, the time spent standing by for a work-related call, following the required off-duty period, may be properly recorded as off-duty time.

    49 CFR §395.8

    Question 26:
    If a driver is permitted to use a CMV for personal reasons, how must the driving time be recorded?

    Guidance:
    When a driver is relieved from work and all responsibility for performing work, time spent traveling from a driver’s home to his/her terminal (normal work reporting location), or from a driver’s terminal to his/her home, may be considered off-duty time. Similarly, time spent traveling short distances from a driver’s en route lodgings (such as en route terminals or motels) to restaurants in the vicinity of such lodgings may be considered off-duty time. The type of conveyance used from the terminal to the driver’s home, from the driver’s home to the terminal, or to restaurants in the vicinity of en route lodgings would not alter the situation unless the vehicle is laden. A driver may not operate a laden CMV as a personal conveyance. The driver who uses a motor carrier’s CMV for transportation home, and is subsequently called by the employing carrier and is then dispatched from home, would be on-duty from the time the driver leaves home.

    A driver placed out of service for exceeding the requirements of the hours of service regulations may not drive a CMV to any location to obtain rest.

    Rules & Regulations - Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


    Matthew Fabry
    Acting Federal Programs Manager
    USDOT/FMCSA-MI Division
    517-853-5990 ext 103

  2. #2
    Moderator TeamCaffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Silex, MO, USA.
    Posts
    5,196

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Great information thanks for sharing!
    Bob & Linda
    OOIDA Members
    Owner/Operator D8000

    “ To avoid criticism, do nothing,
    say nothing, be nothing. ”

    Elbert Hubbard (1856–1915)
    American publisher and writer





  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    TAYLORVILLE, IL, US.
    Posts
    126

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    I wonder about when you go "out of service" to go home or go get repairs etc. if this means you can log all that as off-duty??

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    White Lake, MI
    Posts
    72

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    If it's truck related, like repairs, you must log it. For folks who have a terminal, and drive home empty, they can log as "off duty" for sure. If they are then dispatched from home, then they log driving from home. If they go back to the terminal to pick up, they can log off duty back to the terminal. I am not sure about driving home empty after delivering a load when a terminal is not involved. I will ask my FMCSA contact next time I talk with him about those us who do not have a home terminal.

  5. #5
    Senior Member nightcreacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kent, Oh, USA
    Posts
    4,058

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    To be relieved from duty,you must have a note or card from the company saying that you are not responsible for the load or equipment after you have gone off duty for more than 15 mins.Ive tried to get this from FDCC over the years,and have never been able to aquire one.Unless you have a note or similar one,you can't use your truck as a POV,private owned vehicle.
    Here is something to think about,the garage that works on my truck,sometimes does a customer pick up and dellivery,with the new C_LINK,how do you prove you weren't driving the truck in a case like that.Oh and while garage is diving truck,its on their insurance.

    Owner Opp:
    Roberts Express 1984
    Fedex Custom Critical
    TriState Exp Services
    and now
    Leased to Colonial Freight Systems Inc
    Steve Gilbert
    OOIDA 263839

  6. #6
    Moderator TeamCaffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Silex, MO, USA.
    Posts
    5,196

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    You will have a receipt from the shop for shop time.
    Bob & Linda
    OOIDA Members
    Owner/Operator D8000

    “ To avoid criticism, do nothing,
    say nothing, be nothing. ”

    Elbert Hubbard (1856–1915)
    American publisher and writer





  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    White Lake, MI
    Posts
    72

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by nightcreacher View Post
    To be relieved from duty,you must have a note or card from the company saying that you are not responsible for the load or equipment after you have gone off duty for more than 15 mins.Ive tried to get this from FDCC over the years,and have never been able to aquire one.Unless you have a note or similar one,you can't use your truck as a POV,private owned vehicle.
    Here is something to think about,the garage that works on my truck,sometimes does a customer pick up and dellivery,with the new C_LINK,how do you prove you weren't driving the truck in a case like that.Oh and while garage is diving truck,its on their insurance.
    I know we all know what we think we know. That is why I contacted the FMCSA twice before posting. Both representatives agreed that using your vehicle as personal conveyance is allowed if you are not loaded and have met your sleep requirement. Those are the only requirements. The "interpretations" in the 1st post were sent to me by the 2nd representative who is Acting Director of the FMCSA's Michigan Division. He did homework before calling me back and sending me the "interpretations" that backed up his verbal feedback of qualifying "Off Duty/Driving" situations. I can see that if you were driving someone else's truck, that permission would be required.
    We have to get our own Bobtail insurance for a reason. And my insurance agent has verified, loaded Fedex covers, unloaded Bobtail covers. They are not legally liable for us in any fashion when we are not dispatched. And he thinks they would tell us to call our agent, not theirs if something happened when dispatched but not yet loaded unless actually on our way to the pickup.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Marianna, FL.
    Posts
    165

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    I just got off the phone with someone is Safety about the logging of personal use of the truck and was informed that their interpretation is that there is no such thing. If a driver with a CDL is driving a CMV with a DOT number it must be logged as "On-Duty Driving" with the possible exception of a move lasting 7 minutes or less (no doubt the origin of the .7 mile limit for personal use that I'm told the new EOBR will permit). The person I talked to wasn't the actual "logging specialist" but she insisted that this is the rule and any such usage not so logged was a violation and/or a falsification of the log. She did suggest that I call back tomorrow and talk to Bob. I will do so.

    I am also going to try to get rulings from my regional FMCSA office on this. I do not like this interpretation and use of the EOBR which I am going to be forced to have installed, and will be trying very hard to get it changed. For the record, I do know that as a team we have 2 14-hour clocks to use to manage such things, but it will make it very hard for both of us to get a 34-hour restart if one of us has to log as on-duty to go to the grocery store or a movie while we're twiddling our thumbs for a whole weekend someplace.
    Doug

    FDCC #DR4284

    We may not be living in the Time of the Apocalypse, but we certainly are living in apocalyptic times.

    A Great Quotation that explains much:

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

    C.S. Lewis quotes (British Scholar and Novelist. 1898-1963)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bloomsburg, PA
    Posts
    155

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRed32771 View Post
    I just got off the phone with someone is Safety about the logging of personal use of the truck and was informed that their interpretation is that there is no such thing. If a driver with a CDL is driving a CMV with a DOT number it must be logged as "On-Duty Driving" with the possible exception of a move lasting 7 minutes or less (no doubt the origin of the .7 mile limit for personal use that I'm told the new EOBR will permit). The person I talked to wasn't the actual "logging specialist" but she insisted that this is the rule and any such usage not so logged was a violation and/or a falsification of the log. She did suggest that I call back tomorrow and talk to Bob. I will do so.

    I am also going to try to get rulings from my regional FMCSA office on this. I do not like this interpretation and use of the EOBR which I am going to be forced to have installed, and will be trying very hard to get it changed. For the record, I do know that as a team we have 2 14-hour clocks to use to manage such things, but it will make it very hard for both of us to get a 34-hour restart if one of us has to log as on-duty to go to the grocery store or a movie while we're twiddling our thumbs for a whole weekend someplace.
    When I call in to speak with anyone about logs, I speak with Bob. He is the only one in the department, in my opinion, who knows what he is talking about. I have been given mis-information from others many many times and Bob has been shocked when I have reviewed it with him.

    As for the other point, just because someone in Safety believes there is no such thing as personal use of a CMV doesn’t mean they are correct. It would appear from the specific FMCSA quotes already posted on this site, that the FMCSA does view specific times and circumstances that constitute personal use of a CMV.

    This is but one of many issues FECC will need to resolve, and quickly, as they “work out the bugs” of this hurry-hurry, rush-rush roll out of the new QC and EORB.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    White Lake, MI
    Posts
    72

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    The feedback I got from "our" safety department was similar. Which is why I contacted the FMCSA directly. (This included Bob.)
    I also had a encounter with a Maryland DOT officer last week. She agreed that our personal driving around town between loads was off duty. She noted that the comments should say something like "personal conveyance" when we are driving "Off Duty".

    We also talked about the lack of ability to print out logs. We use our computer for our logging, and I had trouble printing out. She looked up the regs. while waiting for me to get the problem corrected. All logs thru "yesterday" should already be printed out and available to hand to the DOT on demand. We then should be able to print out a partial for the current day.
    I explained that Fedex has a different impression. And she said that if I could not have printed them out, I would have been put out of service for 10 hours with a $280 fine. "If I am wrong, you would have to work that out in court."
    So, even if Fedex is correct saying that the DOT must look at our EOBR to see our logs. This particular DOT agent had a different opinion and I would have been sitting with a fine. That maybe I could have gotten rectified later.
    It has now been nearly 4 weeks since my 1st e-mail to Scott McCahan, with a follow-up e-mail two weeks later. He has yet to respond.

  11. #11

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Relax. Deep breath. Repeat.

    I drove for 2 companies that used EOBRs and it was quite simple. At some scales DOT looked at my display, satisfied their curiosity, and kept going.

    Logs. Current day and prior 7 day recap was available on the display screen. Once, the officer was unable to decipher the info and the safety dept. faxed over a printed copy of my logs. Easy.

    Off-duty driving. Sometimes I was able to drive off-duty during a 30 min. period, from a shipper or receiver only, to a nearby location to grab a bite to eat. No weekend grocery runs allowed.
    Planning ahead was the key.

    Letter. One company provided a letter stating when it considered the driver on and off-duty. i.e. during a 10 hr. break, at a truck stop either waiting to deliver the next day or just empty waiting on a load.

    Relax. FEDEX is a big company with qualified personnel who will implement a proper program. Then there will be the experimental trucks that will determine if the program works properly. Then the rest of the fleet will begin to use the proven and tested program. Easy.

    Why worry about rain in Seattle when you're in sunny Miami and have no plans to go to Seattle??? Let FEDEX do their thing and then we'll do our thing. Easy.
    FEDEX D Unit
    GO-BOT Division
    Space reserved for catchy slogan.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Marianna, FL.
    Posts
    165

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by 1CHINGON View Post
    Relax. Deep breath. Repeat.

    Relax. FEDEX is a big company with qualified personnel who will implement a proper program. Then there will be the experimental trucks that will determine if the program works properly. Then the rest of the fleet will begin to use the proven and tested program. Easy.

    Why worry about rain in Seattle when you're in sunny Miami and have no plans to go to Seattle??? Let FEDEX do their thing and then we'll do our thing. Easy.
    Hate to harsh your mellow, but FEDEX is already rolling out the new QC and EOBR system, and this is still an unresolved issue.

    I know there are work-arounds possible. For us, we'll just have to put all weekend driving time on my wife because I'm usually in much greater need of a 34-hour restart than she is due to the way we divvy up the workload on runs. But work-arounds are beside the point. Why should we have to adapt to a system which is designed around an interpretation of the rules that is flawed? Why are we being forced to work-around or give up a freedom which the law and regulations allows us?
    Doug

    FDCC #DR4284

    We may not be living in the Time of the Apocalypse, but we certainly are living in apocalyptic times.

    A Great Quotation that explains much:

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

    C.S. Lewis quotes (British Scholar and Novelist. 1898-1963)

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    227

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRed32771 View Post
    I just got off the phone with someone is Safety about the logging of personal use of the truck and was informed that their interpretation is that there is no such thing. If a driver with a CDL is driving a CMV with a DOT number it must be logged as "On-Duty Driving" with the possible exception of a move lasting 7 minutes or less (no doubt the origin of the .7 mile limit for personal use that I'm told the new EOBR will permit).
    According to FMSCA; "Personal Use of a Commercial Motor Vehicle
    It is possible that occasionally you may not use a truck in commerce at all. You may be moving your personal belongings to a new house or, as a hobby you may be taking your horses to a horse show. As long as the activity is not in support of a business, you are not operating in commerce.
    If you are not operating your truck in commerce, you are not subject to the hours-of-service regulations."

    http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regul...ide-to-hos.pdf

    Since this is their publication, perhaps safety can give you an interpretation of FMSCA's interpretation...you might want to send them the above link...you will find the "personal use" on page 6.

    Hope this helps
    Last edited by bubblehead; 03-09-2010 at 12:53 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bloomsburg, PA
    Posts
    155

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRed32771 View Post
    Hate to harsh your mellow, but FEDEX is already rolling out the new QC and EOBR system, and this is still an unresolved issue.

    I know there are work-arounds possible. For us, we'll just have to put all weekend driving time on my wife because I'm usually in much greater need of a 34-hour restart than she is due to the way we divvy up the workload on runs. But work-arounds are beside the point. Why should we have to adapt to a system which is designed around an interpretation of the rules that is flawed? Why are we being forced to work-around or give up a freedom which the law and regulations allows us?
    I agree. There is nothing for which to take a chill pill. These are legitimate questions and they deserve correct and accurate answers in a timely manner.

    I was thinking about this today while driving. What about all of the folks who have already been logging personal use of their CMV while using paper logs? Certainly this has shown up in the random log audits completed by FECC. Have they made an issue and classified it as falsification of logs for current practices on paper logs?
    Last edited by MYGIA; 03-10-2010 at 03:40 AM. Reason: spelling

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bloomsburg, PA
    Posts
    155

    Re: Eobr - "off duty/driving" fmsca feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by sweetbillebob View Post
    The feedback I got from "our" safety department was similar. Which is why I contacted the FMCSA directly. (This included Bob.)
    I also had a encounter with a Maryland DOT officer last week. She agreed that our personal driving around town between loads was off duty. She noted that the comments should say something like "personal conveyance" when we are driving "Off Duty".

    We also talked about the lack of ability to print out logs. We use our computer for our logging, and I had trouble printing out. She looked up the regs. while waiting for me to get the problem corrected. All logs thru "yesterday" should already be printed out and available to hand to the DOT on demand. We then should be able to print out a partial for the current day.
    I explained that Fedex has a different impression. And she said that if I could not have printed them out, I would have been put out of service for 10 hours with a $280 fine. "If I am wrong, you would have to work that out in court."
    So, even if Fedex is correct saying that the DOT must look at our EOBR to see our logs. This particular DOT agent had a different opinion and I would have been sitting with a fine. That maybe I could have gotten rectified later.
    It has now been nearly 4 weeks since my 1st e-mail to Scott McCahan, with a follow-up e-mail two weeks later. He has yet to respond.
    Unfortunately, this had been my experience in the past and continues, as my e-mail to Scott McCann of 15 days ago remains unacknowledged.

    I have had much better success going right to the top and sending questions and concerns directly to Jason.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
ExpeditersOnline.Com Copyright © 1999-2011 On Time Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ExpeditersOnline.com © is a registered trademark of On Time Media, LLC